EATZ vs. PHO ETF Comparison

Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO)
EATZ

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF

EATZ Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.38

Average Daily Volume

1,786

Number of Holdings *

21

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PHO

Invesco Water Resources ETF

PHO Description The PowerShares Water Resources Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks and American depositary receipts (ADRs) of companies in the water industry that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index seeks to track the performance of US exchange-listed companies that create products designed to conserve and purify water for homes, businesses and industries. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly and reconstituted annually in April.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$69.50

Average Daily Volume

70,046

Number of Holdings *

36

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period EATZ PHO
30 Days 3.49% -1.68%
60 Days 7.25% -0.84%
90 Days 13.94% 1.80%
12 Months 38.63% 25.97%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in EATZ Weight in PHO Overlap
EATZ Overweight 21 Positions Relative to PHO
Symbol Grade Weight
EAT A 7.2%
TXRH B 6.48%
BROS A 6.28%
CAKE B 5.82%
WING F 5.36%
YUMC B 5.22%
LOCO D 4.8%
USFD B 4.77%
ARMK C 4.67%
DIN C 4.64%
PFGC B 4.56%
CASY B 4.45%
DPZ C 4.35%
SYY B 4.33%
DRI B 4.17%
SGBX F 3.94%
STKS F 3.87%
CMG B 2.42%
YUM D 1.63%
MCD D 1.45%
SHAK B 1.44%
EATZ Underweight 36 Positions Relative to PHO
Symbol Grade Weight
ROP C -7.9%
ECL D -7.5%
XYL D -6.01%
VLTO D -5.79%
PNR A -4.5%
ACM B -4.42%
IEX B -4.41%
WAT B -4.33%
ITRI B -4.09%
WMS F -4.04%
CNM C -3.8%
AWK C -3.62%
TTC D -3.55%
AOS F -3.53%
TTEK F -3.04%
MLI B -2.98%
VMI B -2.64%
WTRG B -2.61%
WTS A -1.79%
ZWS B -1.68%
BMI C -1.66%
MWA B -1.35%
SBS C -1.07%
AWR A -0.85%
FELE B -0.85%
CWT D -0.73%
LNN B -0.7%
SJW F -0.54%
MSEX B -0.42%
ERII D -0.36%
GRC B -0.23%
ARTNA F -0.15%
CWCO C -0.13%
YORW D -0.11%
NWPX A -0.09%
GWRS B -0.02%
Compare ETFs