EATZ vs. MILN ETF Comparison

Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to Global X Millennials Thematic ETF (MILN)
EATZ

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF

EATZ Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.05

Average Daily Volume

1,981

Number of Holdings *

21

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
MILN

Global X Millennials Thematic ETF

MILN Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the INDXX Millennials Thematic Index. The fund invests more than 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure the performance of U.S. listed companies that provide exposure to the millennial generation, as defined by the index provider. The millennial generation refers to the demographic cohort in the U.S. with birth years ranging from 1980 to 2000. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$45.92

Average Daily Volume

7,388

Number of Holdings *

76

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period EATZ MILN
30 Days 7.35% 7.24%
60 Days 10.11% 10.84%
90 Days 12.24% 14.77%
12 Months 40.23% 41.41%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in EATZ Weight in MILN Overlap
CMG B 2.42% 2.52% 2.42%
EATZ Overweight 20 Positions Relative to MILN
Symbol Grade Weight
EAT A 7.2%
TXRH B 6.48%
BROS A 6.28%
CAKE C 5.82%
WING D 5.36%
YUMC C 5.22%
LOCO D 4.8%
USFD A 4.77%
ARMK B 4.67%
DIN C 4.64%
PFGC B 4.56%
CASY A 4.45%
DPZ C 4.35%
SYY D 4.33%
DRI B 4.17%
SGBX F 3.94%
STKS F 3.87%
YUM D 1.63%
MCD D 1.45%
SHAK C 1.44%
EATZ Underweight 75 Positions Relative to MILN
Symbol Grade Weight
SPOT B -3.91%
SE A -3.73%
FI A -3.53%
BKNG A -3.48%
PYPL B -3.37%
NFLX A -3.35%
AAPL C -3.27%
COST A -3.24%
DASH B -3.17%
HD B -3.0%
SBUX A -2.95%
LOW C -2.94%
AMZN C -2.88%
INTU B -2.86%
GOOGL C -2.85%
META D -2.82%
SQ A -2.72%
LULU C -2.38%
UBER F -2.37%
AVB B -2.26%
DIS B -2.23%
EBAY D -2.19%
NKE F -2.11%
ABNB C -2.04%
EQR C -1.93%
CVNA B -1.9%
EXPE B -1.6%
INVH D -1.41%
SNAP D -1.06%
UDR B -1.01%
SFM A -1.0%
SOFI B -0.9%
CPT B -0.9%
KMX B -0.84%
DKS D -0.79%
PLNT A -0.57%
MTCH D -0.56%
PTON A -0.56%
SKX D -0.55%
VFC C -0.53%
HIMS B -0.48%
VSCO C -0.48%
LC A -0.48%
LYFT C -0.47%
AN C -0.47%
VMEO B -0.45%
ETSY D -0.43%
LTH C -0.42%
LRN A -0.42%
ZG A -0.41%
CARG B -0.4%
PRDO B -0.4%
UAA C -0.37%
SLM A -0.36%
COLM C -0.34%
GHC B -0.33%
LAUR A -0.32%
IRT A -0.32%
CSR B -0.31%
NNI D -0.3%
CARS C -0.28%
XPOF C -0.26%
STRA C -0.25%
W D -0.25%
CAR C -0.25%
YELP C -0.23%
ANGI F -0.22%
ZIP D -0.22%
CRI F -0.18%
DBI F -0.15%
CPRI F -0.15%
COUR F -0.14%
TRIP F -0.13%
ACCD D -0.11%
CHGG C -0.05%
Compare ETFs