EATZ vs. CPAI ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI)
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$28.38
Average Daily Volume
1,786
21
CPAI
Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF
CPAI Description
CPAI employs a quantitative, model-driven strategy that integrates quantitative analysis and machine learning insights to navigate diverse market conditions. The portfolio consists of at least 50 US-listed companies of any capitalization or ADRs. The selection process relies on advanced quantitative models leveraging machine learning technology, considering over 30 variables related to value, long-term reversal, momentum, profitability, investor sentiment, and stock price stability. Additionally, the Adviser backtests variable combinations considered to be supported by economic reasoning or investor behavioral biases. The models continually learn and adapt relationships between input variables and realized historic returns, updating during quarterly portfolio rebalances. Moreover, rebalancing ensures the portfolio aligns with the models' rankings, with adjustments made to limit sector exposure to 35% or less.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$35.15
Average Daily Volume
7,155
49
Performance
| Period | EATZ | CPAI |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 3.49% | 2.16% |
| 60 Days | 7.25% | 7.96% |
| 90 Days | 13.94% | 10.65% |
| 12 Months | 38.63% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in EATZ | Weight in CPAI | Overlap |
|---|
EATZ Overweight 21 Positions Relative to CPAI
EATZ Underweight 49 Positions Relative to CPAI
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFM | B | -2.51% | |
| SKYW | B | -2.49% | |
| TRGP | A | -2.46% | |
| TDS | B | -2.43% | |
| CARG | A | -2.37% | |
| LDOS | C | -2.33% | |
| NTGR | A | -2.27% | |
| UNM | A | -2.25% | |
| GDDY | A | -2.23% | |
| OKE | A | -2.21% | |
| FTDR | B | -2.17% | |
| BRBR | A | -2.17% | |
| EQH | B | -2.16% | |
| CNO | A | -2.15% | |
| HTZ | C | -2.13% | |
| FTI | A | -2.13% | |
| ACIW | B | -2.11% | |
| VIRT | A | -2.11% | |
| ORCL | A | -2.09% | |
| CVLT | B | -2.08% | |
| CAH | A | -2.08% | |
| MSI | A | -2.07% | |
| CLBT | C | -2.06% | |
| COR | B | -2.05% | |
| GOOGL | B | -2.05% | |
| GNW | A | -2.03% | |
| PBI | C | -2.01% | |
| PGR | B | -1.93% | |
| META | C | -1.93% | |
| RTX | D | -1.9% | |
| BRC | C | -1.89% | |
| TJX | A | -1.89% | |
| THC | C | -1.88% | |
| LESL | C | -1.87% | |
| NYT | D | -1.85% | |
| ZIM | A | -1.84% | |
| MSFT | D | -1.83% | |
| WBA | F | -1.82% | |
| AAPL | C | -1.81% | |
| PAA | A | -1.8% | |
| PAGP | A | -1.79% | |
| WES | C | -1.76% | |
| LLY | F | -1.74% | |
| MHO | D | -1.72% | |
| PRM | C | -1.72% | |
| ROST | D | -1.72% | |
| UHS | D | -1.64% | |
| HCA | F | -1.61% | |
| AGL | F | -0.95% |
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
CPAI: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
