DEEP vs. XHS ETF Comparison

Comparison of Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS)

DEEP

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF

DEEP Description

The investment seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Acquirers Deep Value Index (the “index”). The index was established in 2020 by Acquirers Funds LLC and tracks the performance of a portfolio of 20 of the most undervalued, fundamentally strong stocks drawn from the largest 500 stocks listed in the United States meeting certain liquidity thresholds. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund’s total assets (exclusive of any collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$35.82

Average Daily Volume

3,374

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$92.60

Average Daily Volume

4,057

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	DEEP	XHS
30 Days	-0.16%	-4.20%
60 Days	-0.37%	-4.44%
90 Days	0.54%	-4.11%
12 Months	9.26%	9.54%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in DEEP	Weight in XHS	Overlap
AMN	F	0.52%	1.06%	0.52%
CCRN	F	0.66%	0.59%	0.59%
NRC	F	0.86%	0.31%	0.31%

DEEP Overweight 93 Positions Relative to XHS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SMLR	B	1.87%
IGIC	A	1.29%
BMRC	A	1.25%
PGC	A	1.25%
ARCH	B	1.24%
RYI	C	1.21%
HSII	B	1.18%
METC	C	1.18%
PRDO	B	1.16%
NATR	B	1.15%
HCKT	B	1.14%
MCFT	C	1.13%
PFBC	B	1.13%
BSIG	A	1.13%
RCMT	C	1.13%
NRP	B	1.12%
TTEC	F	1.12%
BBW	B	1.11%
BHLB	B	1.1%
GPRK	C	1.1%
VSTO	A	1.1%
VBTX	B	1.1%
BXC	B	1.09%
PLPC	B	1.09%
BKE	B	1.09%
DXLG	D	1.08%
HELE	C	1.08%
AMCX	C	1.07%
HLF	C	1.07%
EPM	A	1.06%
INMD	C	1.06%
NX	C	1.06%
UPBD	C	1.05%
DMLP	A	1.05%
PLAB	D	1.04%
DAC	B	1.04%
MBUU	C	1.03%
XPEL	C	1.03%
HTBK	B	1.03%
DHIL	A	1.03%
SBH	B	1.02%
AMPY	D	1.02%
UAN	B	1.02%
ITRN	B	1.02%
WGO	D	1.02%
WINA	B	1.02%
OFLX	D	1.02%
LPRO	C	1.01%
DHT	D	0.99%
WLKP	A	0.99%
NUS	C	0.99%
UTMD	F	0.98%
IMKTA	C	0.98%
USNA	C	0.98%
SMP	C	0.98%
WTI	F	0.97%
INVA	C	0.97%
WNC	D	0.97%
MED	F	0.97%
MOV	D	0.97%
NVEC	D	0.96%
GIII	D	0.96%
SD	F	0.95%
SWBI	C	0.95%
TH	C	0.94%
KFRC	D	0.93%
IIIN	D	0.92%
WRLD	D	0.92%
FF	F	0.92%
PARR	F	0.92%
RGR	F	0.91%
IRWD	F	0.9%
ETD	D	0.9%
LESL	C	0.9%
RMAX	D	0.89%
LEGH	D	0.89%
RMR	F	0.88%
JOUT	F	0.87%
DFIN	D	0.87%
ODP	F	0.85%
JBSS	F	0.85%
RGP	F	0.84%
HZO	F	0.83%
GIC	F	0.82%
HVT	D	0.79%
MYE	F	0.79%
CRCT	F	0.78%
LPG	F	0.78%
HOV	D	0.77%
CLFD	F	0.74%
SIGA	F	0.72%
HDSN	F	0.72%
ASC	D	0.67%

DEEP Underweight 55 Positions Relative to XHS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIMS	C	-2.63%
HQY	A	-2.56%
RDNT	B	-2.5%
MCK	A	-2.46%
GH	B	-2.36%
PINC	B	-2.35%
EHC	B	-2.27%
LH	B	-2.26%
CAH	B	-2.24%
SEM	B	-2.21%
DGX	A	-2.13%
RCM	A	-2.12%
COR	B	-2.12%
THC	C	-2.1%
PRVA	C	-2.1%
UNH	C	-2.09%
CHE	F	-2.05%
ENSG	D	-2.0%
CVS	F	-1.99%
DVA	C	-1.98%
HSIC	C	-1.98%
ADUS	D	-1.96%
AMED	F	-1.95%
PDCO	F	-1.87%
CI	D	-1.86%
HUM	D	-1.84%
HCA	F	-1.83%
UHS	D	-1.81%
MOH	F	-1.79%
USPH	C	-1.7%
SGRY	F	-1.67%
CRVL	A	-1.65%
CNC	F	-1.63%
ELV	F	-1.55%
BKD	F	-1.48%
OMI	F	-1.48%
NEO	C	-1.45%
OPCH	F	-1.45%
MD	C	-1.41%
AHCO	D	-1.25%
CLOV	D	-1.25%
CSTL	C	-1.24%
LFST	C	-1.24%
PGNY	F	-1.21%
ALHC	C	-1.14%
ACHC	F	-1.05%
NHC	B	-1.02%
ASTH	F	-1.01%
AGL	F	-1.01%
PNTG	D	-0.71%
ACCD	F	-0.64%
OPK	B	-0.64%
CYH	F	-0.63%
MODV	D	-0.52%
FLGT	F	-0.42%