CPAI vs. IPDP ETF Comparison

Comparison of Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI) to Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP)
CPAI

Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF

CPAI Description

CPAI employs a quantitative, model-driven strategy that integrates quantitative analysis and machine learning insights to navigate diverse market conditions. The portfolio consists of at least 50 US-listed companies of any capitalization or ADRs. The selection process relies on advanced quantitative models leveraging machine learning technology, considering over 30 variables related to value, long-term reversal, momentum, profitability, investor sentiment, and stock price stability. Additionally, the Adviser backtests variable combinations considered to be supported by economic reasoning or investor behavioral biases. The models continually learn and adapt relationships between input variables and realized historic returns, updating during quarterly portfolio rebalances. Moreover, rebalancing ensures the portfolio aligns with the models' rankings, with adjustments made to limit sector exposure to 35% or less.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$35.35

Average Daily Volume

7,175

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
IPDP

Dividend Performers ETF

IPDP Description The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$20.23

Average Daily Volume

1,329

Number of Holdings *

50

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CPAI IPDP
30 Days 2.73% 0.42%
60 Days 8.37% 4.65%
90 Days 10.75% 6.78%
12 Months 30.48%
5 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CPAI Weight in IPDP Overlap
AAPL C 1.81% 2.25% 1.81%
BRC C 1.89% 2.25% 1.89%
CAH B 2.08% 2.37% 2.08%
COR B 2.05% 2.28% 2.05%
MSI B 2.07% 1.72% 1.72%
CPAI Overweight 44 Positions Relative to IPDP
Symbol Grade Weight
SFM A 2.51%
SKYW B 2.49%
TRGP A 2.46%
TDS B 2.43%
CARG B 2.37%
LDOS C 2.33%
NTGR A 2.27%
UNM A 2.25%
GDDY A 2.23%
OKE A 2.21%
FTDR B 2.17%
BRBR A 2.17%
EQH B 2.16%
CNO B 2.15%
HTZ C 2.13%
FTI A 2.13%
ACIW B 2.11%
VIRT A 2.11%
ORCL A 2.09%
CVLT B 2.08%
CLBT B 2.06%
GOOGL B 2.05%
GNW A 2.03%
PBI B 2.01%
PGR B 1.93%
META C 1.93%
RTX D 1.9%
TJX A 1.89%
THC C 1.88%
LESL C 1.87%
NYT D 1.85%
ZIM A 1.84%
MSFT D 1.83%
WBA F 1.82%
PAA B 1.8%
PAGP A 1.79%
WES C 1.76%
LLY F 1.74%
MHO D 1.72%
PRM B 1.72%
ROST D 1.72%
UHS D 1.64%
HCA F 1.61%
AGL F 0.95%
CPAI Underweight 45 Positions Relative to IPDP
Symbol Grade Weight
ACN C -2.36%
AIT B -2.34%
SYK A -2.33%
AMP A -2.32%
CSCO B -2.32%
TT A -2.31%
SNA B -2.31%
HNI B -2.3%
GWW B -2.29%
ADP B -2.29%
SEIC B -2.28%
HIG B -2.27%
TRV A -2.27%
CTAS B -2.27%
BRO B -2.27%
MCK A -2.26%
APOG B -2.26%
ABM B -2.24%
UNH C -2.23%
ABT A -2.23%
ETN B -2.22%
RGA B -2.2%
DOV B -2.2%
APH B -2.17%
ECL D -2.16%
MMC D -2.16%
IEX B -2.14%
DCI B -2.09%
TROW B -2.04%
JNJ D -2.02%
WTS B -1.99%
UPS C -1.88%
LECO C -1.87%
A F -1.78%
AOS F -1.74%
KLAC F -1.68%
GPC F -1.67%
QCOM F -1.6%
MRK F -1.52%
NSP F -1.52%
ELV F -1.51%
AVGO C -0.25%
HD A -0.24%
HPQ B -0.23%
CSX C -0.22%
Compare ETFs