CGRO vs. PGJ ETF Comparison
Comparison of CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
CGRO
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF
CGRO Description
CGRO aims to benefit from high-growth sectors in Greater China without compromising American values and interests. The fund includes companies of all sizes located or primarily traded in mainland China, Taiwan, and Chinas special administrative regions, such as Hong Kong. The portfolio construction starts with top-down macro research, which utilizes publicly available data to identify sectors with the highest growth potential. The fund also conducts on-the-ground due diligence wherein it gains insights from 15 investment professionals located in China. Lastly, a fundamental bottom-up approach is used to analyze company-specific data such as financial reports and management expertise. The weight of each sector and company is determined by the sub-advisers assessment of its growth potential, which may change over time. The fund may invest in China A-shares, depositary receipts, and issuers listed on exchanges outside China.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$20.33
Average Daily Volume
222
4
PGJ
PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio
PGJ Description
The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$22.93
Average Daily Volume
47,799
54
Performance
| Period | CGRO | PGJ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -3.91% | -6.73% |
| 60 Days | -6.15% | -11.39% |
| 90 Days | 1.03% | -3.46% |
| 12 Months | -6.73% |
CGRO Overweight 1 Positions Relative to PGJ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDD | D | 6.57% |
CGRO Underweight 51 Positions Relative to PGJ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BABA | D | -8.2% | |
| JD | D | -6.95% | |
| BIDU | F | -6.91% | |
| YUMC | F | -6.6% | |
| NTES | D | -4.58% | |
| BEKE | C | -3.96% | |
| ZTO | F | -3.87% | |
| NIO | F | -3.84% | |
| BZ | D | -3.61% | |
| VIPS | F | -3.41% | |
| YMM | D | -3.22% | |
| HTHT | F | -3.15% | |
| TAL | D | -2.69% | |
| LI | F | -2.59% | |
| QFIN | D | -1.77% | |
| IQ | D | -1.24% | |
| XPEV | F | -1.2% | |
| BILI | C | -1.15% | |
| ATHM | D | -1.13% | |
| HOLI | B | -0.94% | |
| RLX | F | -0.79% | |
| ATAT | B | -0.75% | |
| DQ | F | -0.71% | |
| MOMO | B | -0.65% | |
| CSIQ | F | -0.63% | |
| GDS | B | -0.63% | |
| FINV | C | -0.57% | |
| JKS | D | -0.57% | |
| ZLAB | F | -0.54% | |
| GOTU | D | -0.53% | |
| WB | D | -0.48% | |
| TIGR | B | -0.37% | |
| EH | D | -0.36% | |
| SOHU | A | -0.3% | |
| HUYA | C | -0.27% | |
| QD | F | -0.23% | |
| VNET | C | -0.2% | |
| RERE | C | -0.19% | |
| DOYU | B | -0.19% | |
| DDL | C | -0.18% | |
| NOAH | D | -0.17% | |
| LX | F | -0.14% | |
| TUYA | F | -0.13% | |
| KC | F | -0.12% | |
| API | D | -0.11% | |
| WDH | D | -0.1% | |
| DADA | F | -0.1% | |
| DAO | C | -0.09% | |
| BZUN | D | -0.07% | |
| NIU | F | -0.06% | |
| IMAB | F | -0.06% |
CGRO: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PGJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
