CANE vs. FCOM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV (CANE) to Fidelity MSCI Telecommunication Services Index ETF (FCOM)
CANE

Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV

CANE Description

The investment seeks to replicate, net of expenses, the performance of ICE Sugar Futures Contracts. The fund seeks to have the daily changes in percentage terms of the shares' net asset value (NAV) reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of a weighted average of the closing settlement prices for three futures contracts for sugar that are traded on ICE Futures US, specifically: (1) the second-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 35%, (2) the third-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 30%, and (3) the Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract expiring in the March following the expiration month of the third-to-expire contract, weighted 35%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$11.60

Average Daily Volume

33,592

Number of Holdings *

2

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
FCOM

Fidelity MSCI Telecommunication Services Index ETF

FCOM Description The investment seeks to provide investment returns that correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. Investing at least 80% of assets in securities included in the fund's underlying index. The fund's underlying index is the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index, which represents the performance of the telecommunication services sector in the U.S. equity market. It may or may not hold all of the securities in the MSCI USA IMI Telecommunication Services 25/50 Index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$50.62

Average Daily Volume

93,172

Number of Holdings *

89

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CANE FCOM
30 Days 4.55% 1.83%
60 Days -5.09% -4.89%
90 Days 0.62% -1.08%
12 Months -21.39% 25.46%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CANE Weight in FCOM Overlap
T A 10.96% 3.98% 3.98%
CANE Overweight 1 Positions Relative to FCOM
Symbol Grade Weight
HUM D 10.96%
CANE Underweight 88 Positions Relative to FCOM
Symbol Grade Weight
META C -24.09%
GOOGL D -11.23%
GOOG D -8.61%
NFLX B -4.55%
VZ B -4.54%
CMCSA C -4.24%
DIS F -3.76%
TMUS B -3.35%
TTD B -1.82%
EA C -1.73%
CHTR C -1.73%
RBLX B -1.51%
TTWO B -1.38%
OMC B -1.23%
WBD D -1.19%
LYV D -1.08%
IPG B -1.06%
PINS F -0.99%
NWSA C -0.92%
MTCH B -0.86%
FOXA B -0.86%
TKO B -0.76%
NYT C -0.75%
ROKU C -0.74%
SNAP F -0.68%
LBRDK C -0.65%
PARA F -0.5%
NXST D -0.49%
LUMN B -0.47%
FOX B -0.47%
FYBR A -0.46%
EDR A -0.43%
IAC C -0.35%
MSGS B -0.28%
LSXMK C -0.27%
CCOI A -0.27%
CNK A -0.26%
IRDM D -0.24%
ZI F -0.22%
CARG B -0.21%
TDS B -0.21%
SATS A -0.21%
TGNA D -0.21%
ZD F -0.19%
YELP F -0.19%
MGNI D -0.15%
CABO F -0.14%
TRIP F -0.13%
MSGE B -0.11%
LILAK D -0.11%
AMC D -0.11%
CARS D -0.1%
QNST B -0.09%
LBRDA C -0.09%
USM B -0.08%
LGF.A F -0.08%
IMAX B -0.08%
GSAT C -0.08%
VMEO B -0.07%
SCHL D -0.07%
IAS C -0.07%
SSTK F -0.07%
PUBM F -0.06%
IDT B -0.06%
ZIP C -0.06%
TTGT F -0.06%
SHEN F -0.06%
EVER D -0.05%
MAX B -0.05%
BMBL D -0.05%
THRY D -0.05%
STGW C -0.05%
LGF.A F -0.04%
ADV B -0.04%
GTN F -0.04%
GOGO D -0.04%
FUBO D -0.04%
MCS A -0.03%
LILA D -0.03%
CNSL A -0.03%
BOC C -0.03%
CCO D -0.03%
ATUS C -0.03%
ATEX C -0.03%
ANGI B -0.02%
EB F -0.02%
AMCX F -0.02%
ATNI C -0.02%
Compare ETFs