BMVP vs. CZA ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF (BMVP) to Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA)
BMVP

Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-factor ETF

BMVP Description

The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index seeks to include the 50 securities with the strongest momentum, most muted volatility, most inexpensive valuations, and highest profitability based on an aggregated sector-neutral "MVP" score. Stocks are selected from the top of each sector and size category in a manner designed to produce an index with sector and size dispersion similar to the overall broad market.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$48.87

Average Daily Volume

1,026

Number of Holdings *

53

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$109.09

Average Daily Volume

3,094

Number of Holdings *

94

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period BMVP CZA
30 Days -0.95% -1.02%
60 Days 2.62% 2.49%
90 Days 4.95% 5.97%
12 Months 31.24% 26.60%
7 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in BMVP Weight in CZA Overlap
AMCR D 1.66% 0.92% 0.92%
BAH D 1.69% 1.48% 1.48%
BRO B 1.95% 1.98% 1.95%
ETR A 2.08% 2.01% 2.01%
LDOS C 1.81% 1.68% 1.68%
LYB F 1.59% 1.74% 1.59%
WTW B 1.95% 2.02% 1.95%
BMVP Overweight 46 Positions Relative to CZA
Symbol Grade Weight
TRGP A 2.44%
AMP A 2.2%
LNG A 2.17%
FI A 2.16%
GWW B 2.09%
HON B 2.04%
EOG A 2.01%
MSI B 2.0%
CAH B 1.98%
ADP B 1.98%
FOXA B 1.98%
SPG A 1.96%
COR B 1.96%
AXP B 1.95%
WMT A 1.92%
T A 1.9%
TJX A 1.88%
COST A 1.88%
UNH C 1.86%
HIG B 1.85%
HD A 1.85%
PGR B 1.85%
MCO D 1.84%
SHW C 1.83%
MMC D 1.83%
SSNC C 1.82%
RTX D 1.8%
AAPL C 1.78%
IRM C 1.78%
SYY D 1.77%
EIX C 1.77%
NTAP C 1.75%
MMM D 1.75%
VICI C 1.75%
GD D 1.75%
KMB C 1.73%
FE C 1.72%
OMC C 1.72%
IBM C 1.71%
CI D 1.71%
NVR D 1.69%
LMT D 1.68%
BBY D 1.65%
PHM D 1.65%
ABBV F 1.54%
ELV F 1.42%
BMVP Underweight 87 Positions Relative to CZA
Symbol Grade Weight
VMC B -2.47%
WAB B -2.19%
AVB B -2.11%
XYL D -1.93%
PPG F -1.83%
KEYS C -1.81%
EQR C -1.8%
STT B -1.79%
DOV B -1.74%
FTV D -1.67%
VLTO C -1.63%
AEE A -1.51%
WRB B -1.49%
CINF A -1.47%
IFF D -1.47%
TDY B -1.45%
ES C -1.41%
LPLA A -1.39%
PKG B -1.36%
NTRS A -1.36%
J D -1.33%
CSL C -1.32%
ESS A -1.28%
CHKP D -1.26%
PFG C -1.26%
AER B -1.25%
JBHT C -1.22%
FOX A -1.18%
CRBG B -1.14%
TRMB B -1.12%
MAS D -1.12%
BAX F -1.12%
IEX B -1.1%
PNR B -1.08%
WLK F -1.07%
WMG C -1.06%
GGG B -0.94%
UDR C -0.93%
ACM B -0.93%
WES C -0.87%
GLPI C -0.87%
PFGC B -0.84%
REG A -0.84%
CNA C -0.84%
NVT C -0.82%
CACI C -0.8%
LOGI F -0.8%
WPC C -0.78%
ITT A -0.77%
RRX B -0.76%
ATR B -0.73%
EMN D -0.72%
CHDN C -0.7%
BWXT A -0.69%
AIZ A -0.68%
WWD B -0.67%
AOS F -0.66%
SEIC B -0.65%
ALSN B -0.64%
EHC B -0.63%
CR A -0.62%
INGR B -0.62%
TFX F -0.58%
KNTK A -0.56%
CHE F -0.52%
IVZ C -0.51%
ESAB C -0.5%
VOYA B -0.49%
BLCO B -0.47%
FLS A -0.46%
OSK C -0.46%
BPOP C -0.44%
MDU D -0.43%
AWI B -0.43%
ESI B -0.43%
COLD F -0.4%
SIGI B -0.38%
IDA A -0.38%
FNB B -0.38%
SLGN A -0.37%
ESNT D -0.37%
SNDR B -0.35%
RRR F -0.35%
CWEN C -0.34%
ACT D -0.33%
ST F -0.32%
FLO D -0.29%
Compare ETFs