BMED vs. NOBL ETF Comparison

Comparison of BlackRock Future Health ETF (BMED) to ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF (NOBL)
BMED

BlackRock Future Health ETF

BMED Description

The investment seeks to maximize total return. Under normal market conditions, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets plus any borrowings for investment purposes in equity securities of companies principally engaged in the health sciences group of industries. While the fund will invest primarily in companies providing products and services for human health, it may also invest in companies whose products or services relate to the growth or survival of animals and plants. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.31

Average Daily Volume

902

Number of Holdings *

97

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF

NOBL Description The investment seeks investment results before fees and expenses that track the performance of the S&P 500® Dividend Aristocrats® Index (the "index"). The fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities (i.e., securities of the index and comparable securities that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities of the index). The index contains a minimum of 40 stocks, which are equally weighted, and no single sector is allowed to comprise more than 30% of the index weight.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$106.34

Average Daily Volume

422,256

Number of Holdings *

65

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period BMED NOBL
30 Days -2.78% 0.16%
60 Days -4.02% 1.29%
90 Days -3.97% 3.19%
12 Months 14.46% 20.15%
5 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in BMED Weight in NOBL Overlap
ABBV F 1.31% 1.33% 1.31%
ABT B 2.22% 1.53% 1.53%
BDX F 0.5% 1.42% 0.5%
MDT D 1.64% 1.46% 1.46%
WST C 1.42% 1.41% 1.41%
BMED Overweight 92 Positions Relative to NOBL
Symbol Grade Weight
ISRG A 4.94%
BSX A 4.53%
ARGX B 3.25%
GILD C 3.05%
DHR F 2.15%
TECH F 2.04%
RGEN D 1.97%
SRPT F 1.89%
WAT C 1.87%
PODD C 1.75%
ALNY D 1.72%
NTRA A 1.45%
EXAS D 1.45%
TMO F 1.41%
BMY B 1.4%
NBIX C 1.39%
SNY F 1.37%
RYTM C 1.35%
PFE F 1.34%
BGNE D 1.29%
AMGN F 1.16%
INSM C 1.06%
XENE D 1.06%
DNLI D 1.05%
VRTX D 1.02%
EW C 1.0%
MRUS F 0.99%
UTHR C 0.96%
EXEL B 0.94%
QGEN D 0.94%
DXCM C 0.93%
A D 0.93%
LH B 0.91%
BIIB F 0.9%
PEN B 0.89%
BPMC B 0.87%
GH B 0.84%
HOLX D 0.82%
IQV F 0.82%
SYK B 0.8%
CRL D 0.79%
RVMD C 0.72%
PCVX D 0.7%
NUVL C 0.61%
PTCT B 0.6%
ROIV C 0.59%
HALO F 0.58%
GEHC D 0.58%
NRIX C 0.58%
GKOS B 0.58%
ACLX C 0.56%
STE D 0.55%
INSP D 0.52%
LBPH A 0.5%
IONS F 0.5%
BEAM D 0.41%
TARS C 0.39%
STOK F 0.38%
RARE F 0.38%
ASND F 0.34%
BNTX C 0.34%
ARVN F 0.33%
DYN F 0.31%
TWST F 0.31%
NVCR C 0.31%
RNA C 0.3%
AXSM B 0.3%
IMCR D 0.3%
RCKT F 0.29%
EWTX C 0.27%
ALKS C 0.27%
BBIO F 0.22%
PTGX D 0.18%
SRRK C 0.17%
IRON B 0.16%
RCUS F 0.15%
VYGR F 0.13%
ORIC F 0.13%
AUTL F 0.13%
VKTX F 0.13%
IMTX F 0.12%
ARCT F 0.11%
ALLO F 0.11%
BCYC F 0.11%
WVE C 0.1%
ACIU D 0.1%
RGNX D 0.1%
ARWR D 0.09%
SAGE F 0.07%
PRTA F 0.06%
VIGL F 0.04%
FDMT F 0.04%
BMED Underweight 60 Positions Relative to NOBL
Symbol Grade Weight
EMR B -1.81%
GPC D -1.67%
CINF A -1.67%
ALB B -1.66%
DOV A -1.65%
BEN C -1.64%
FAST B -1.64%
GWW B -1.64%
CHD A -1.63%
PNR A -1.62%
CVX A -1.62%
CAH B -1.62%
TROW B -1.61%
CLX A -1.61%
ITW B -1.6%
NUE C -1.58%
TGT F -1.58%
BRO B -1.58%
KVUE A -1.57%
CTAS B -1.57%
SHW B -1.57%
ADP A -1.56%
ATO A -1.56%
CHRW B -1.56%
SPGI C -1.55%
WMT A -1.54%
ROP B -1.54%
APD A -1.54%
NDSN B -1.54%
SYY D -1.54%
XOM B -1.53%
EXPD C -1.53%
PG C -1.53%
AFL B -1.52%
LOW C -1.52%
ESS B -1.52%
KMB C -1.51%
CAT B -1.51%
FRT B -1.5%
CB C -1.49%
PPG F -1.47%
ECL D -1.46%
MCD D -1.46%
IBM C -1.45%
MKC C -1.44%
CL D -1.44%
GD D -1.44%
SJM D -1.43%
LIN C -1.43%
JNJ C -1.43%
HRL D -1.43%
AOS F -1.41%
ADM D -1.41%
NEE C -1.4%
AMCR C -1.39%
KO D -1.39%
PEP F -1.39%
ED C -1.37%
O C -1.36%
SWK D -1.28%
Compare ETFs