BEDZ vs. XMLV ETF Comparison

Comparison of AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) to PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (XMLV)
BEDZ

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF

BEDZ Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the hotel business. It may also invest in companies involved in other lodging and travel-related services. The fund invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ?ADRs. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.65

Average Daily Volume

352

Number of Holdings *

24

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XMLV

PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio

XMLV Description The PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is compiled, maintained and calculated by Standard & Poor's, consisting of 80 out of 400 medium-capitalization range securities from the S&P MidCap 400 Index with the lowest realized volatility over the past 12 months. Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down asset price fluctuations over time. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$54.58

Average Daily Volume

34,389

Number of Holdings *

80

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period BEDZ XMLV
30 Days -0.45% -1.60%
60 Days -3.66% -2.02%
90 Days -7.32% -1.16%
12 Months 12.00% 9.12%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in BEDZ Weight in XMLV Overlap
GLPI B 2.74% 1.45% 1.45%
WH C 3.63% 1.19% 1.19%
BEDZ Overweight 22 Positions Relative to XMLV
Symbol Grade Weight
EXPE C 5.59%
BKNG B 5.57%
TH D 5.48%
TCOM C 5.47%
RCL B 5.21%
NCLH C 4.96%
IHG B 4.95%
XHR D 4.87%
APLE D 4.43%
HST D 4.39%
MGM B 4.37%
MAR C 4.2%
HLT B 4.19%
RHP D 4.05%
VICI D 4.03%
BYD C 4.01%
PLYA D 3.16%
TRIP F 3.16%
PK D 2.69%
H C 2.46%
ABNB B 1.75%
GHG F 0.28%
BEDZ Underweight 78 Positions Relative to XMLV
Symbol Grade Weight
DTM B -1.54%
SEIC D -1.52%
ATR D -1.52%
ADC B -1.49%
PNM D -1.49%
CW C -1.47%
CACI B -1.45%
ORI D -1.44%
MUSA C -1.42%
NNN B -1.41%
INGR D -1.39%
EHC B -1.39%
POST C -1.38%
OGE C -1.38%
CASY B -1.36%
IDA D -1.35%
AM B -1.34%
ELS C -1.33%
AMH A -1.33%
DCI D -1.32%
PRI C -1.31%
NJR D -1.29%
RGA C -1.29%
LSTR D -1.29%
EGP B -1.29%
CVLT B -1.28%
EPR C -1.28%
MDU C -1.28%
NWE D -1.28%
ESNT C -1.27%
OHI B -1.27%
STAG B -1.26%
MTG B -1.26%
SR C -1.26%
AFG D -1.25%
ACM D -1.24%
GATX B -1.23%
RLI D -1.23%
TXRH B -1.23%
GNTX D -1.22%
POR D -1.22%
KEX B -1.21%
USFD C -1.21%
ALE C -1.2%
HLI A -1.2%
MSM F -1.2%
VOYA D -1.2%
THG D -1.2%
BRX B -1.19%
MMS B -1.19%
SNX D -1.18%
GGG D -1.18%
CHE D -1.18%
SIGI F -1.17%
OGS C -1.17%
NFG D -1.17%
FHI C -1.17%
WTRG C -1.16%
FR C -1.16%
SON F -1.15%
SF B -1.14%
WEN F -1.14%
PFGC D -1.14%
WPC D -1.13%
COLM D -1.12%
KBR D -1.11%
UNM D -1.1%
ITT D -1.09%
VNT D -1.09%
DLB D -1.09%
NEU D -1.09%
BKH D -1.09%
ARW D -1.08%
RPM D -1.07%
GHC D -1.06%
PCH F -1.05%
FLO D -1.05%
LECO F -0.94%
Compare ETFs