BEDZ vs. RFG ETF Comparison

Comparison of AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG)
BEDZ

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF

BEDZ Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the hotel business. It may also invest in companies involved in other lodging and travel-related services. The fund invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ?ADRs. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.65

Average Daily Volume

352

Number of Holdings *

24

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$48.17

Average Daily Volume

36,715

Number of Holdings *

84

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period BEDZ RFG
30 Days -0.45% -1.29%
60 Days -3.66% -2.86%
90 Days -7.32% -3.58%
12 Months 12.00% 26.83%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in BEDZ Weight in RFG Overlap
BYD C 4.01% 0.45% 0.45%
H C 2.46% 1.64% 1.64%
PK D 2.69% 1.28% 1.28%
BEDZ Overweight 21 Positions Relative to RFG
Symbol Grade Weight
EXPE C 5.59%
BKNG B 5.57%
TH D 5.48%
TCOM C 5.47%
RCL B 5.21%
NCLH C 4.96%
IHG B 4.95%
XHR D 4.87%
APLE D 4.43%
HST D 4.39%
MGM B 4.37%
MAR C 4.2%
HLT B 4.19%
RHP D 4.05%
VICI D 4.03%
WH C 3.63%
PLYA D 3.16%
TRIP F 3.16%
GLPI B 2.74%
ABNB B 1.75%
GHG F 0.28%
BEDZ Underweight 81 Positions Relative to RFG
Symbol Grade Weight
CNX C -2.47%
ELF C -2.4%
WFRD B -2.23%
SWN D -2.21%
DUOL F -2.09%
WING B -2.06%
FIX D -2.0%
PR C -1.97%
RYAN B -1.92%
MEDP C -1.91%
APPF B -1.89%
BLD D -1.86%
CELH F -1.83%
AAON B -1.72%
ONTO B -1.64%
TOL D -1.64%
MUSA C -1.63%
EME D -1.61%
OC D -1.49%
CLH B -1.47%
VAL B -1.46%
LNTH C -1.41%
KNSL F -1.37%
RMBS B -1.36%
RRC D -1.34%
CHRD C -1.33%
OVV D -1.29%
CHDN B -1.26%
NVT D -1.25%
VVV B -1.23%
CROX C -1.2%
SSD F -1.18%
RS D -1.18%
EXP D -1.16%
TXRH B -1.15%
DT F -1.15%
CIVI D -1.1%
SAIA C -1.09%
PSTG B -1.09%
LII B -1.09%
WSM D -1.08%
OLED A -1.08%
CASY B -1.07%
SKX C -1.05%
COKE B -0.99%
MANH B -0.99%
WLK D -0.98%
UFPI D -0.95%
GTLS D -0.93%
NEU D -0.92%
FND F -0.91%
LOPE C -0.91%
MTDR D -0.91%
RBA B -0.89%
TPX D -0.88%
PRI C -0.87%
ALTR B -0.87%
ESAB D -0.85%
WSO B -0.85%
AIT C -0.82%
EXEL C -0.82%
LNW B -0.78%
WMS D -0.77%
QLYS D -0.77%
CR C -0.76%
PLNT B -0.75%
TREX F -0.74%
RBC C -0.74%
ARWR C -0.73%
LECO F -0.71%
BCO B -0.7%
VNT D -0.69%
HALO B -0.65%
ACHC F -0.64%
PGNY D -0.63%
DBX D -0.52%
FCN D -0.51%
PEN D -0.51%
CAR F -0.5%
COTY F -0.48%
FIVE F -0.44%
Compare ETFs