BEDZ vs. QLTY ETF Comparison

Comparison of AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) to GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY)
BEDZ

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF

BEDZ Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the hotel business. It may also invest in companies involved in other lodging and travel-related services. The fund invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ?ADRs. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.21

Average Daily Volume

295

Number of Holdings *

23

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

QLTY Description QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.45

Average Daily Volume

265,587

Number of Holdings *

34

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period BEDZ QLTY
30 Days 8.74% 0.40%
60 Days 12.03% 0.12%
90 Days 18.31% 2.04%
12 Months 27.96% 26.17%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in BEDZ Weight in QLTY Overlap
HLT A 2.89% 2.62% 2.62%
BEDZ Overweight 22 Positions Relative to QLTY
Symbol Grade Weight
NCLH B 6.06%
RCL A 5.88%
CCL A 5.52%
EXPE B 5.36%
BKNG A 5.27%
TH C 5.12%
MCRI A 4.63%
TCOM B 4.53%
RHP B 4.52%
PEB D 4.25%
MAR A 4.17%
BYD B 4.15%
PK C 4.05%
WH B 4.04%
INN D 3.99%
VICI C 3.78%
HST C 3.63%
APLE B 3.32%
IHG A 2.7%
XHR B 2.68%
GLPI C 2.55%
H B 2.22%
BEDZ Underweight 33 Positions Relative to QLTY
Symbol Grade Weight
MSFT D -6.46%
AAPL C -5.33%
ORCL A -4.71%
META D -4.5%
GOOGL C -4.43%
JNJ C -4.24%
ABT B -4.17%
UNH B -3.62%
TXN C -3.53%
ACN B -3.3%
V A -3.22%
PG C -3.2%
ISRG A -2.92%
KLAC F -2.85%
LRCX F -2.85%
CRM B -2.84%
KO D -2.81%
ARMK B -2.56%
ELV F -2.5%
WFC A -2.45%
AVGO D -2.45%
MRK D -2.41%
AMZN C -2.4%
USB A -2.31%
OTIS C -2.25%
TJX A -2.14%
GE D -1.73%
MDLZ F -1.72%
LLY F -1.61%
STZ D -1.59%
CI D -1.49%
DGX A -1.35%
TMO F -0.91%
Compare ETFs