AWEG vs. PSCH ETF Comparison

Comparison of Alger Weatherbie Enduring Growth ETF (AWEG) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap Health Care Portfolio (PSCH)

AWEG

Alger Weatherbie Enduring Growth ETF

AWEG Description

The fund invests primarily in equity securities of mid-cap growth companies with an environmental, social and governance ("ESG") rating of medium or better, as rated by Sustainalytics, a third-party ESG rating agency, at the time of purchase. Under normal circumstances, 80% of companies in the fund"s portfolio, based on net assets, will have a Sustainalytics ESG rating. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.15

Average Daily Volume

170

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PSCH

PowerShares S&P SmallCap Health Care Portfolio

PSCH Description

The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Health Care Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600Â® Capped Health Care Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks in the health care sector. Included are healthcare companies principally engaged in the business of providing healthcare-related products and services, including biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, medical technology and supplies, and facilities. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600Â® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$44.83

Average Daily Volume

11,932

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	AWEG	PSCH
30 Days	2.61%	-1.48%
60 Days	4.67%	-5.76%
90 Days	6.99%	-2.28%
12 Months	33.65%	19.09%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in AWEG	Weight in PSCH	Overlap
GKOS	B	4.99%	4.86%	4.86%
PGNY	F	2.07%	0.81%	0.81%
TNDM	F	4.84%	1.25%	1.25%

AWEG Overweight 21 Positions Relative to PSCH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TDG	D	11.7%
CWST	A	6.43%
STEP	B	4.87%
WCN	A	4.8%
HEI	A	4.66%
PCTY	B	3.92%
NEOG	D	3.62%
HUBS	B	3.14%
OLLI	D	2.99%
SPSC	F	2.94%
ACAD	C	2.9%
MEG	F	2.87%
XPO	B	2.86%
UPST	B	2.77%
RXO	C	2.64%
HLNE	B	2.11%
NCNO	B	2.09%
SITE	D	2.02%
AGYS	A	1.77%
NTRA	B	1.44%
TTD	B	1.41%

AWEG Underweight 66 Positions Relative to PSCH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MMSI	A	-3.73%
INSP	F	-3.66%
CORT	C	-3.46%
ADMA	C	-3.29%
KRYS	C	-3.15%
ALKS	C	-2.97%
RDNT	B	-2.95%
ITGR	B	-2.86%
HIMS	C	-2.77%
ICUI	D	-2.7%
OGN	F	-2.58%
SEM	B	-2.58%
PBH	A	-2.49%
TGTX	C	-2.4%
CRVL	A	-2.04%
TMDX	F	-1.79%
PTGX	D	-1.7%
CPRX	C	-1.67%
VCEL	B	-1.65%
NARI	B	-1.61%
UFPT	C	-1.57%
PINC	B	-1.5%
OMCL	C	-1.44%
ADUS	D	-1.43%
CNMD	C	-1.41%
LGND	C	-1.38%
PRVA	B	-1.36%
LMAT	A	-1.33%
FTRE	D	-1.31%
SUPN	B	-1.26%
NEO	C	-1.26%
ASTH	F	-1.22%
AMPH	F	-1.15%
NHC	B	-1.04%
IART	C	-1.03%
PDCO	D	-1.02%
MYGN	F	-0.99%
DVAX	C	-0.99%
STAA	F	-0.91%
XNCR	B	-0.91%
USPH	C	-0.89%
HRMY	D	-0.86%
MD	B	-0.83%
CERT	F	-0.75%
AMN	F	-0.69%
INVA	C	-0.69%
AORT	B	-0.68%
AHCO	F	-0.67%
COLL	F	-0.65%
SDGR	D	-0.65%
ANIP	D	-0.64%
OMI	F	-0.6%
RCUS	F	-0.6%
AVNS	F	-0.59%
BLFS	D	-0.59%
EMBC	C	-0.56%
VIR	F	-0.55%
PCRX	C	-0.5%
HSTM	B	-0.48%
CTKB	C	-0.47%
IRWD	D	-0.44%
MLAB	F	-0.4%
RGNX	F	-0.32%
SLP	F	-0.31%
PAHC	B	-0.3%
FLGT	F	-0.24%