ZSB vs. DMAT ETF Comparison
Comparison of USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund (ZSB) to Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT)
ZSB
USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy Fund
ZSB Description
The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in metals derivative instruments ("Metals Derivatives") and, to a lesser extent in the equity securities of companies that are economically tied to the metals that are necessary for "Electrification." As an important component of the fund"s sustainable strategy, the fund also seeks to achieve a "net-zero" carbon footprint by purchasing carbon offset investments ("Carbon Offset Investments") in an amount equal to the estimated aggregate carbon emissions of the fund"s holdings. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$14.75
Average Daily Volume
276
6
DMAT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
DMAT Description
The Global X Disruptive Materials ETF (DMAT) seeks to invest in companies producing metals and other raw materials that are essential to the expansion of disruptive technologies, such as lithium batteries, solar panels, wind turbines, fuel cells, robotics, and 3D printers. Targeted materials include companies involved in the exploration, mining, production and/or enhancement of Rare Earth Materials, Zinc, Palladium & Platinum, Nickel, Manganese, Lithium, Graphene & Graphite, Copper, Cobalt & Carbon Fiber.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$17.50
Average Daily Volume
3,266
7
Performance
Period | ZSB | DMAT |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 2.75% | 6.51% |
60 Days | 12.77% | 39.78% |
90 Days | 10.32% | 30.21% |
12 Months | -18.15% | 24.60% |
ZSB: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
DMAT: Top Represented Industries & Keywords