XMLV vs. LCLG ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (XMLV) to Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG)

XMLV

PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio

XMLV Description

The PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is compiled, maintained and calculated by Standard & Poor's, consisting of 80 out of 400 medium-capitalization range securities from the S&P MidCap 400 Index with the lowest realized volatility over the past 12 months. Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down asset price fluctuations over time. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$64.83

Average Daily Volume

30,461

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

LCLG

Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF

LCLG Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests primarily in securities of companies that use innovative technologies or ideas to gain advantage over competitors. The Advisor expects to invest principally in large capitalization equity securities that are traded on U.S. securities exchanges. The fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in securities of foreign issuers, including issuers in emerging markets.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$53.64

Average Daily Volume

562

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XMLV	LCLG
30 Days	5.64%	8.70%
60 Days	6.68%	10.68%
90 Days	9.27%	12.18%
12 Months	30.39%	42.48%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in XMLV	Weight in LCLG	Overlap
	TXRH	C	1.25%	1.54%	1.25%

XMLV Overweight 78 Positions Relative to LCLG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DTM	B	1.87%
SEIC	B	1.8%
ATR	B	1.8%
CW	B	1.78%
IBKR	A	1.61%
SF	B	1.6%
FHI	A	1.55%
VOYA	B	1.52%
INGR	B	1.49%
IDA	A	1.47%
UNM	A	1.46%
HLI	B	1.45%
THG	A	1.45%
ORI	A	1.44%
PNM	F	1.44%
EHC	B	1.44%
RGA	A	1.43%
DCI	B	1.41%
JEF	A	1.41%
G	B	1.4%
RLI	B	1.4%
JHG	A	1.39%
CACI	D	1.39%
FLS	B	1.39%
AM	A	1.35%
OGE	B	1.34%
PRI	A	1.33%
AFG	A	1.32%
RPM	A	1.32%
GGG	B	1.32%
USFD	A	1.31%
ADC	B	1.29%
ACM	A	1.28%
NJR	A	1.28%
AMG	B	1.28%
GLPI	C	1.23%
SON	D	1.22%
PPC	C	1.22%
NWE	B	1.22%
GNTX	C	1.22%
OHI	C	1.21%
SR	A	1.21%
ELS	C	1.2%
GEF	A	1.2%
AMH	D	1.19%
POST	C	1.19%
EPR	D	1.18%
CHE	D	1.17%
BRX	A	1.17%
GATX	A	1.16%
NFG	A	1.16%
SLGN	A	1.16%
ALE	A	1.15%
OGS	A	1.14%
LSTR	D	1.13%
BKH	A	1.13%
SBRA	C	1.13%
MTG	C	1.13%
SNX	C	1.11%
FLO	D	1.11%
POR	C	1.1%
EGP	F	1.09%
ESNT	D	1.09%
NNN	D	1.09%
CDP	C	1.08%
AVT	C	1.08%
FR	C	1.07%
MUSA	A	1.07%
MSA	D	1.07%
NEU	C	1.04%
STAG	F	1.04%
NYT	C	1.03%
DLB	B	1.01%
KBR	F	0.99%
WTRG	B	0.98%
MMS	F	0.97%
MAN	D	0.92%
CHRD	D	0.87%

XMLV Underweight 56 Positions Relative to LCLG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
APP	B	-5.16%
NFLX	A	-5.14%
AAPL	C	-4.63%
MA	C	-4.62%
AMZN	C	-4.3%
APH	A	-4.28%
AVGO	D	-3.99%
META	D	-3.86%
KLAC	D	-3.65%
DKS	C	-3.01%
CTAS	B	-2.83%
URI	B	-2.58%
GOOGL	C	-2.56%
FAST	B	-2.32%
ODFL	B	-2.16%
DECK	A	-1.86%
GOOG	C	-1.8%
TTD	B	-1.78%
COIN	C	-1.78%
LAD	A	-1.76%
BURL	A	-1.75%
ANET	C	-1.69%
WSM	B	-1.65%
CPRT	A	-1.62%
SHW	A	-1.58%
MTD	D	-1.58%
LECO	B	-1.46%
EA	A	-1.32%
WAT	B	-1.29%
SBUX	A	-1.28%
ZBRA	B	-1.2%
ADBE	C	-1.1%
ACN	C	-1.07%
MAR	B	-0.98%
NDSN	B	-0.96%
HD	A	-0.93%
GPK	C	-0.9%
LPLA	A	-0.87%
MNST	C	-0.87%
PAYC	B	-0.84%
A	D	-0.82%
HUBB	B	-0.8%
IQV	D	-0.69%
LOGI	D	-0.68%
LULU	C	-0.66%
ZTS	D	-0.59%
TRMB	B	-0.58%
ELF	C	-0.56%
ETN	A	-0.53%
POOL	C	-0.45%
CRL	C	-0.41%
NSP	D	-0.4%
LW	C	-0.38%
RH	B	-0.36%
OMF	A	-0.35%
IPGP	D	-0.25%