XMHQ vs. FFTY ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) to Innovator IBD 50 Fund ETF (FFTY)

XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

XMHQ Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400Â® Quality Index (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider first calculates the quality score of each security in the S&P MidCap 400Â® Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$99.14

Average Daily Volume

269,982

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FFTY

Innovator IBD 50 Fund ETF

FFTY Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes) in companies included in the IBD® 50 Index. It is actively managed. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest in a portfolio of U.S.-listed, exchange-traded equities. FFTY picks 50 leading growth companies that trade on US exchanges, potentially including ADRs. After screening out securities with extreme recent price movements, the universe is ranked by a composite of 11 different fundamental and technical metrics. The top 50 stocks are weighted in tiers, with more weight given to higher-ranking companies. Components of the index are reviewed on a weekly basis. Based on market-wide technical signals, FFTY may substitute half of its equity portfolio with Treasury bills. The index will remain half equity, half T-bills until a reversal signal occurs. Its worth noting that the funds high-turnover strategy could lead to poor tracking and/or taxable capital gains payouts.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.98

Average Daily Volume

54,602

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XMHQ	FFTY
30 Days	-2.78%	1.50%
60 Days	-1.84%	3.89%
90 Days	2.28%	9.81%
12 Months	26.34%	28.55%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in XMHQ	Weight in FFTY	Overlap
EME	A	3.49%	2.99%	2.99%
FIX	B	2.38%	3.52%	2.38%
LNTH	C	1.31%	1.99%	1.31%

XMHQ Overweight 73 Positions Relative to FFTY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MANH	D	4.08%
CSL	C	4.02%
WSM	F	3.69%
RNR	C	2.48%
RS	C	2.3%
THC	C	2.27%
OC	B	2.07%
PSTG	D	2.04%
TOL	C	2.03%
LECO	B	1.99%
GGG	D	1.93%
CW	B	1.78%
KNSL	F	1.78%
DT	B	1.7%
BLD	F	1.66%
DKS	F	1.65%
MEDP	F	1.62%
WMS	F	1.59%
RGLD	B	1.43%
EXP	B	1.41%
CHE	F	1.41%
CROX	F	1.36%
CELH	F	1.36%
AYI	A	1.33%
CNM	D	1.33%
PRI	B	1.3%
MUSA	C	1.3%
CR	B	1.28%
AFG	D	1.24%
UFPI	C	1.22%
INGR	C	1.22%
AIT	A	1.22%
SAIC	A	1.21%
TREX	B	1.21%
LSCC	C	1.19%
SEIC	A	1.19%
DCI	B	1.11%
LSTR	D	1.1%
CVLT	B	1.1%
PCTY	A	1.05%
SSD	F	1.03%
RLI	B	1.02%
COKE	D	0.96%
ROIV	D	0.94%
WFRD	F	0.91%
DINO	F	0.9%
KBH	D	0.87%
MTG	D	0.86%
CHX	F	0.85%
CBT	B	0.85%
MSA	F	0.83%
ELF	F	0.83%
ESNT	F	0.83%
EXPO	D	0.82%
VNT	B	0.82%
G	C	0.82%
CRUS	F	0.81%
VVV	D	0.8%
QLYS	F	0.77%
MSM	D	0.62%
NEU	D	0.61%
NSP	F	0.54%
LOPE	D	0.53%
LANC	B	0.51%
ENS	F	0.51%
TEX	F	0.49%
FHI	A	0.48%
SAM	C	0.46%
YETI	F	0.46%
IBOC	B	0.43%
CRI	F	0.41%
VC	F	0.4%
CXT	F	0.36%

XMHQ Underweight 47 Positions Relative to FFTY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIMS	B	-3.77%
POWL	A	-3.6%
NVDA	B	-3.59%
VRT	B	-3.58%
STRL	B	-3.57%
PLTR	B	-3.47%
ATAT	B	-3.46%
DOCS	A	-3.28%
ARM	B	-3.22%
CLS	A	-3.21%
YOU	A	-3.09%
NTRA	B	-3.05%
BWIN	C	-3.0%
ANET	B	-3.0%
HROW	C	-2.95%
DUOL	A	-2.92%
BGNE	C	-2.79%
ADMA	B	-2.77%
IOT	C	-2.07%
MNDY	A	-2.05%
CWAN	B	-2.03%
RCL	B	-2.01%
FTAI	A	-2.01%
RYAN	C	-1.99%
IBKR	A	-1.99%
AXON	B	-1.99%
ONON	D	-1.92%
AFRM	A	-1.12%
TT	C	-1.0%
MELI	A	-1.0%
VITL	C	-0.99%
TW	B	-0.99%
NOW	A	-0.99%
FOUR	B	-0.99%
TVTX	B	-0.98%
HWM	B	-0.97%
NFLX	A	-0.96%
PACS	A	-0.51%
KVYO	A	-0.51%
FTNT	B	-0.51%
ALNY	C	-0.51%
AGX	A	-0.5%
DY	C	-0.49%
DECK	B	-0.49%
AMSC	A	-0.49%
TOST	A	-0.48%
ZETA	C	-0.46%