XHS vs. TMFM ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM)

XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$92.60

Average Daily Volume

4,057

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

TMFM

Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF

TMFM Description

Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF is an exchange traded fund launched by The RBB Fund, Inc. It is managed by Motley Fool Asset Management, LLC. It invests in public equity markets of the United States. It invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth stocks of mid-cap companies, within the market capitalization range of the Russell Midcap Growth Total Return Index. The fund employs fundamental analysis to create its portfolio. The fund seeks to benchmark the performance of its portfolio against the Russell Midcap Growth Total Return Index. Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF was formed on November 1, 2010 and is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$31.58

Average Daily Volume

5,987

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XHS	TMFM
30 Days	-4.20%	4.23%
60 Days	-4.44%	9.51%
90 Days	-4.11%	12.62%
12 Months	9.54%	35.37%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in XHS	Weight in TMFM	Overlap
	HQY	A	2.56%	3.63%	2.56%

XHS Overweight 57 Positions Relative to TMFM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIMS	C	2.63%
RDNT	B	2.5%
MCK	A	2.46%
GH	B	2.36%
PINC	B	2.35%
EHC	B	2.27%
LH	B	2.26%
CAH	B	2.24%
SEM	B	2.21%
DGX	A	2.13%
RCM	A	2.12%
COR	B	2.12%
THC	C	2.1%
PRVA	C	2.1%
UNH	C	2.09%
CHE	F	2.05%
ENSG	D	2.0%
CVS	F	1.99%
DVA	C	1.98%
HSIC	C	1.98%
ADUS	D	1.96%
AMED	F	1.95%
PDCO	F	1.87%
CI	D	1.86%
HUM	D	1.84%
HCA	F	1.83%
UHS	D	1.81%
MOH	F	1.79%
USPH	C	1.7%
SGRY	F	1.67%
CRVL	A	1.65%
CNC	F	1.63%
ELV	F	1.55%
BKD	F	1.48%
OMI	F	1.48%
NEO	C	1.45%
OPCH	F	1.45%
MD	C	1.41%
AHCO	D	1.25%
CLOV	D	1.25%
CSTL	C	1.24%
LFST	C	1.24%
PGNY	F	1.21%
ALHC	C	1.14%
AMN	F	1.06%
ACHC	F	1.05%
NHC	B	1.02%
ASTH	F	1.01%
AGL	F	1.01%
PNTG	D	0.71%
ACCD	F	0.64%
OPK	B	0.64%
CYH	F	0.63%
CCRN	F	0.59%
MODV	D	0.52%
FLGT	F	0.42%
NRC	F	0.31%

XHS Underweight 28 Positions Relative to TMFM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BRO	B	-6.01%
TYL	B	-5.54%
AXON	A	-4.9%
TOST	A	-4.53%
BR	B	-4.48%
SNEX	B	-4.16%
GMED	A	-3.88%
FAST	B	-3.78%
RXO	C	-3.6%
HRI	C	-3.34%
SBAC	D	-3.32%
GNTX	F	-2.98%
WAT	C	-2.98%
WSO	A	-2.95%
GWRE	A	-2.91%
GXO	B	-2.9%
GSHD	B	-2.86%
ALRM	C	-2.86%
DXCM	C	-2.48%
TREX	D	-2.41%
TRU	D	-2.39%
MORN	B	-2.35%
EMN	D	-2.21%
CSGP	F	-2.13%
RARE	F	-2.08%
BMRN	F	-2.02%
TSCO	D	-1.84%
ARE	F	-1.63%