XHS vs. QVAL ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL)
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$94.89

Average Daily Volume

5,187

Number of Holdings *

57

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
QVAL

ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

QVAL Description The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF. Under normal circumstances, it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. equity securities that the Adviser believes, based on quantitative analysis, are undervalued at the time of purchase and have the potential for capital appreciation. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. It will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$45.75

Average Daily Volume

20,417

Number of Holdings *

50

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period XHS QVAL
30 Days -3.93% 1.77%
60 Days -2.19% 6.81%
90 Days 6.31% 6.93%
12 Months 17.13% 30.43%
5 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in XHS Weight in QVAL Overlap
CNC F 1.96% 1.81% 1.81%
CVS D 2.04% 1.97% 1.97%
ELV F 1.89% 1.88% 1.88%
MOH D 1.9% 1.95% 1.9%
THC C 2.04% 2.01% 2.01%
XHS Overweight 52 Positions Relative to QVAL
Symbol Grade Weight
HIMS B 2.14%
AGL F 2.12%
EHC B 2.09%
CHE C 2.09%
SGRY C 2.08%
UHS D 2.07%
HCA B 2.05%
RDNT C 2.04%
ADUS D 2.03%
HQY C 2.02%
HSIC D 2.02%
DGX B 2.01%
AMED D 2.01%
RCM B 2.01%
DVA C 1.99%
PDCO F 1.97%
SEM D 1.96%
PINC F 1.96%
HUM F 1.95%
OPCH F 1.95%
CAH B 1.94%
ENSG D 1.94%
ACHC F 1.94%
UNH B 1.94%
CI D 1.9%
MCK F 1.85%
OMI F 1.82%
AMN F 1.81%
BKD D 1.73%
GH F 1.7%
PRVA F 1.67%
USPH F 1.52%
CRVL C 1.47%
PGNY F 1.39%
ASTH A 1.3%
NEO F 1.29%
AHCO C 1.23%
PETQ A 1.16%
LFST B 1.15%
CLOV B 1.12%
CSTL C 1.08%
MD B 1.04%
NHC D 0.96%
ALHC B 0.95%
CYH C 0.92%
CCRN F 0.8%
PNTG C 0.74%
ACCD F 0.66%
OPK D 0.57%
FLGT F 0.47%
MODV F 0.37%
NRC F 0.35%
XHS Underweight 45 Positions Relative to QVAL
Symbol Grade Weight
POWL A -2.59%
SIG C -2.29%
WSM B -2.27%
ULTA D -2.19%
DAL C -2.19%
ASO D -2.18%
UFPI C -2.13%
KBH C -2.09%
TPR B -2.07%
CAT A -2.06%
T A -2.04%
JBL D -2.04%
BKR B -2.04%
OC C -2.04%
CMCSA B -2.03%
PCAR D -2.03%
LBRT F -2.03%
URBN F -2.02%
LEN B -2.02%
FCX B -2.02%
OMC C -2.01%
WCC C -2.01%
HRB C -1.99%
SNA A -1.98%
MAT D -1.97%
CRI D -1.97%
ALSN A -1.96%
FOXA A -1.95%
CROX C -1.95%
GTES C -1.94%
GPK C -1.93%
SLB D -1.93%
CTSH B -1.92%
HAL F -1.9%
IPG C -1.89%
TAP D -1.87%
CEIX B -1.86%
MO D -1.86%
TEX F -1.85%
SKX B -1.84%
ARCH D -1.84%
SM F -1.83%
WFRD F -1.82%
MPC F -1.82%
DVN F -1.81%
Compare ETFs