XHS vs. QTUM ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM)

XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$88.83

Average Daily Volume

8,362

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QTUM

Defiance Quantum ETF

QTUM Description

The investment seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index (the "index"). Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund's total assets (exclusive of any collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index or in depositary receipts representing such component securities. The index consists of a modified equal-weighted portfolio of the stock of companies whose products or services are predominantly tied to the development of quantum computing and machine learning technology. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$64.16

Average Daily Volume

34,879

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XHS	QTUM
30 Days	-4.31%	1.33%
60 Days	-0.46%	7.42%
90 Days	-2.04%	6.94%
12 Months	-2.31%	30.27%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in XHS	Weight in QTUM	Overlap
	RDNT	B	2.2%	1.39%	1.39%

XHS Overweight 55 Positions Relative to QTUM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PGNY	D	2.31%
PDCO	F	2.29%
ACHC	F	2.27%
SEM	A	2.26%
HQY	B	2.23%
HCA	C	2.22%
EHC	B	2.22%
UHS	C	2.22%
AMED	A	2.21%
ENSG	B	2.21%
HUM	C	2.2%
CHE	D	2.2%
OPCH	F	2.19%
MCK	B	2.19%
PINC	F	2.18%
ELV	C	2.18%
DVA	C	2.18%
THC	C	2.18%
CI	D	2.18%
CAH	D	2.17%
DGX	C	2.17%
RCM	F	2.17%
MOH	F	2.15%
PRVA	D	2.14%
CNC	D	2.13%
UNH	D	2.13%
SGRY	F	2.12%
HSIC	D	2.12%
CVS	D	2.11%
GH	C	2.1%
AGL	D	2.08%
AMN	F	2.04%
HIMS	C	1.84%
ADUS	B	1.73%
BKD	C	1.65%
OMI	F	1.56%
NEO	D	1.45%
CRVL	B	1.15%
AHCO	D	1.13%
LFST	D	0.93%
USPH	F	0.93%
OPK	D	0.92%
MD	F	0.85%
ASTH	C	0.75%
ACCD	F	0.74%
NHC	A	0.73%
CCRN	F	0.71%
PETQ	B	0.67%
MODV	F	0.65%
CSTL	F	0.65%
ALHC	B	0.6%
CYH	D	0.6%
FLGT	F	0.55%
PNTG	B	0.49%
NRC	F	0.26%

XHS Underweight 49 Positions Relative to QTUM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
WIT	A	-1.57%
ACN	D	-1.54%
GOOGL	A	-1.52%
FORM	A	-1.51%
TDC	C	-1.5%
HON	B	-1.5%
BAH	C	-1.5%
RGTI	F	-1.5%
CRUS	A	-1.49%
MSFT	A	-1.49%
LMT	C	-1.48%
LRCX	B	-1.48%
NOC	D	-1.48%
SNPS	B	-1.47%
IBM	B	-1.47%
COHR	B	-1.47%
JNPR	B	-1.47%
ESTC	B	-1.46%
HPE	C	-1.46%
INTC	C	-1.45%
AMD	B	-1.45%
CDNS	B	-1.44%
NVDA	B	-1.44%
TER	A	-1.44%
TSM	A	-1.44%
KLAC	B	-1.43%
AMAT	B	-1.42%
ONTO	B	-1.42%
NOK	C	-1.42%
ORAN	D	-1.41%
TXN	B	-1.41%
ABBV	C	-1.4%
ASML	A	-1.4%
MKSI	B	-1.39%
MCHP	C	-1.38%
ADI	B	-1.38%
MSTR	D	-1.38%
MU	C	-1.37%
RTX	D	-1.37%
NXPI	B	-1.36%
MRVL	C	-1.36%
BABA	D	-1.35%
BIDU	F	-1.34%
LSCC	D	-1.32%
QCOM	B	-1.32%
SYNA	F	-1.32%
ON	C	-1.3%
STM	C	-1.25%
NVEC	D	-1.21%