XHS vs. PINK ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK)

XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$94.44

Average Daily Volume

4,017

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PINK

Simplify Health Care ETF

PINK Description

Simplify Exchange Traded Funds - Simplify Health Care ETF seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of U.S. health care companies. The fund adviser defines health care companies as companies included in the Global Industry Classification Standard health care sector. The fund will typically invest in 50 – 100 health care companies. The adviser generally seeks investments in companies that are developing new and effective medicines, as well as companies whose business models reduce costs or improve quality in health care systems.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$30.91

Average Daily Volume

117,279

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XHS	PINK
30 Days	-0.01%	-4.15%
60 Days	-2.53%	-6.48%
90 Days	-4.43%	-6.16%
12 Months	10.84%	24.32%

7 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in XHS	Weight in PINK	Overlap
AGL	F	1.01%	0.28%	0.28%
CI	D	1.86%	3.01%	1.86%
ELV	F	1.55%	1.89%	1.55%
HCA	F	1.83%	0.4%	0.4%
HSIC	C	1.98%	0.18%	0.18%
THC	D	2.1%	0.54%	0.54%
UNH	B	2.09%	4.94%	2.09%

XHS Overweight 51 Positions Relative to PINK

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIMS	B	2.63%
HQY	A	2.56%
RDNT	B	2.5%
MCK	A	2.46%
GH	B	2.36%
PINC	B	2.35%
EHC	B	2.27%
LH	B	2.26%
CAH	B	2.24%
SEM	B	2.21%
DGX	A	2.13%
RCM	A	2.12%
COR	B	2.12%
PRVA	C	2.1%
CHE	D	2.05%
ENSG	C	2.0%
CVS	D	1.99%
DVA	C	1.98%
ADUS	D	1.96%
AMED	F	1.95%
PDCO	F	1.87%
HUM	C	1.84%
UHS	D	1.81%
MOH	F	1.79%
USPH	B	1.7%
SGRY	F	1.67%
CRVL	B	1.65%
CNC	D	1.63%
BKD	F	1.48%
OMI	F	1.48%
NEO	C	1.45%
OPCH	D	1.45%
MD	C	1.41%
AHCO	F	1.25%
CLOV	D	1.25%
CSTL	D	1.24%
LFST	B	1.24%
PGNY	F	1.21%
ALHC	C	1.14%
AMN	F	1.06%
ACHC	F	1.05%
NHC	C	1.02%
ASTH	F	1.01%
PNTG	D	0.71%
ACCD	D	0.64%
OPK	C	0.64%
CYH	F	0.63%
CCRN	F	0.59%
MODV	C	0.52%
FLGT	F	0.42%
NRC	F	0.31%

XHS Underweight 44 Positions Relative to PINK

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SRPT	F	-10.02%
LLY	F	-7.03%
PCT	C	-7.0%
SNY	F	-4.89%
ZTS	D	-4.86%
ISRG	A	-4.75%
JNJ	C	-4.56%
REGN	F	-4.19%
ABBV	F	-3.88%
TMO	F	-3.54%
GILD	C	-3.35%
CHWY	B	-2.24%
MMM	D	-2.24%
TNDM	D	-2.02%
TFX	F	-2.0%
MYGN	F	-1.98%
RVTY	F	-1.29%
RPRX	D	-1.11%
TUA	F	-1.05%
IQV	F	-0.95%
ITCI	C	-0.94%
AVTR	F	-0.91%
EXAS	D	-0.83%
ABT	B	-0.67%
AKRO	B	-0.66%
ARGX	B	-0.55%
FULC	F	-0.52%
ESTA	D	-0.39%
SNDX	F	-0.34%
LIVN	F	-0.31%
VEEV	C	-0.28%
SYK	B	-0.27%
BMRN	F	-0.25%
TECH	F	-0.25%
DHR	F	-0.24%
BIIB	F	-0.19%
ZBH	C	-0.16%
BSX	A	-0.04%
VLTO	C	-0.03%
INSM	C	-0.02%
BMY	B	-0.02%
MASI	B	-0.01%
EMBC	C	-0.01%
MRK	D	-0.0%