XHS vs. MNA ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA)
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$91.29

Average Daily Volume

3,933

Number of Holdings *

58

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
MNA

IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF

MNA Description The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of its underlying index, the IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. The fund employs a "passive management" to track the performance of the underlying index, which was developed by Financial Development Holdco LLC ("IndexIQ"). The underlying index seeks to employ a systematic investment process designed to identify opportunities in companies whose equity securities trade in developed markets, including the U.S., and which are involved in announced mergers, acquisitions and other buyout-related transactions. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.63

Average Daily Volume

49,281

Number of Holdings *

45

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period XHS MNA
30 Days -4.69% -0.82%
60 Days -5.83% -0.94%
90 Days -3.87% 0.18%
12 Months 9.84% 6.18%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in XHS Weight in MNA Overlap
RCM A 2.12% 1.99% 1.99%
XHS Overweight 57 Positions Relative to MNA
Symbol Grade Weight
HIMS C 2.63%
HQY A 2.56%
RDNT B 2.5%
MCK A 2.46%
GH B 2.36%
PINC B 2.35%
EHC B 2.27%
LH B 2.26%
CAH A 2.24%
SEM B 2.21%
DGX A 2.13%
COR B 2.12%
THC C 2.1%
PRVA B 2.1%
UNH B 2.09%
CHE D 2.05%
ENSG D 2.0%
CVS D 1.99%
DVA C 1.98%
HSIC C 1.98%
ADUS D 1.96%
AMED F 1.95%
PDCO D 1.87%
CI D 1.86%
HUM D 1.84%
HCA F 1.83%
UHS D 1.81%
MOH F 1.79%
USPH C 1.7%
SGRY F 1.67%
CRVL A 1.65%
CNC F 1.63%
ELV F 1.55%
BKD F 1.48%
OMI F 1.48%
NEO C 1.45%
OPCH F 1.45%
MD B 1.41%
AHCO F 1.25%
CLOV D 1.25%
CSTL C 1.24%
LFST C 1.24%
PGNY F 1.21%
ALHC C 1.14%
AMN F 1.06%
ACHC F 1.05%
NHC B 1.02%
ASTH F 1.01%
AGL F 1.01%
PNTG D 0.71%
ACCD F 0.64%
OPK A 0.64%
CYH F 0.63%
CCRN F 0.59%
MODV D 0.52%
FLGT F 0.42%
NRC F 0.31%
XHS Underweight 44 Positions Relative to MNA
Symbol Grade Weight
DFS B -8.94%
CTLT D -5.65%
JNPR D -5.04%
HCP B -4.32%
FYBR C -3.64%
MRO A -3.5%
SMAR A -3.18%
ALTR B -3.09%
BALY A -2.77%
ALE A -2.67%
INST B -2.61%
ENV B -2.56%
K B -2.44%
AXNX A -2.37%
AY A -2.08%
IBTX B -2.08%
B A -2.05%
SPR D -1.99%
INFN D -1.72%
NAPA A -1.58%
EVRI A -1.57%
SASR A -1.49%
VZIO A -1.33%
HTLF B -1.27%
FBMS B -1.22%
ZUO B -1.17%
AGS A -0.83%
HAYN A -0.75%
PFC A -0.65%
GATO C -0.43%
RVNC F -0.43%
CFB B -0.41%
PGRU A -0.35%
SRDX C -0.26%
BUSE B --0.42%
WSBC A --0.66%
CDE C --1.15%
RNST B --1.23%
UMBF B --1.29%
AUB A --1.51%
BA F --1.69%
SSB B --2.1%
IP A --4.38%
COF B --9.54%
Compare ETFs