XHS vs. FIVG ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to Defiance Next Gen Connectivity ETF (FIVG)

XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$94.01

Average Daily Volume

5,177

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FIVG

Defiance Next Gen Connectivity ETF

FIVG Description

The investment seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Bluestar 5G Communications Index (the index). The fund uses a passive management approach to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the index. The index consists of a tiered, modified market capitalization-weighted portfolio of the U.S.-listed equity securities, including depositary receipts, of companies whose products or services are predominantly tied to the development of 5G networking and communication technologies. At least 80% of the fund's total assets will be invested in the component securities of the index. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$41.68

Average Daily Volume

49,097

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	XHS	FIVG
30 Days	-4.19%	-1.41%
60 Days	-0.63%	6.06%
90 Days	5.93%	18.34%
12 Months	15.56%	26.27%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in XHS	Weight in FIVG	Overlap

XHS Overweight 57 Positions Relative to FIVG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HIMS	C	2.14%
AGL	F	2.12%
EHC	C	2.09%
CHE	D	2.09%
SGRY	C	2.08%
UHS	D	2.07%
HCA	C	2.05%
THC	D	2.04%
CVS	D	2.04%
RDNT	C	2.04%
ADUS	D	2.03%
HQY	B	2.02%
HSIC	D	2.02%
DGX	D	2.01%
AMED	D	2.01%
RCM	B	2.01%
DVA	C	1.99%
PDCO	F	1.97%
SEM	D	1.96%
CNC	F	1.96%
PINC	F	1.96%
HUM	F	1.95%
OPCH	F	1.95%
CAH	B	1.94%
ENSG	D	1.94%
ACHC	F	1.94%
UNH	B	1.94%
MOH	F	1.9%
CI	D	1.9%
ELV	F	1.89%
MCK	F	1.85%
OMI	F	1.82%
AMN	F	1.81%
BKD	F	1.73%
GH	F	1.7%
PRVA	F	1.67%
USPH	F	1.52%
CRVL	C	1.47%
PGNY	F	1.39%
ASTH	B	1.3%
NEO	F	1.29%
AHCO	D	1.23%
PETQ	A	1.16%
LFST	C	1.15%
CLOV	B	1.12%
CSTL	B	1.08%
MD	B	1.04%
NHC	D	0.96%
ALHC	C	0.95%
CYH	C	0.92%
CCRN	F	0.8%
PNTG	C	0.74%
ACCD	F	0.66%
OPK	D	0.57%
FLGT	F	0.47%
MODV	F	0.37%
NRC	F	0.35%

XHS Underweight 49 Positions Relative to FIVG

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AVGO	B	-5.29%
NVDA	B	-5.04%
AAPL	C	-4.85%
ORCL	A	-4.84%
CSCO	A	-3.91%
QCOM	D	-3.57%
ANET	A	-2.84%
MRVL	C	-1.98%
DDOG	B	-1.97%
ERIC	C	-1.84%
COMM	C	-1.83%
NOK	C	-1.82%
KEYS	B	-1.8%
NTAP	D	-1.79%
CIEN	A	-1.78%
ARM	C	-1.76%
CRDO	B	-1.7%
FFIV	B	-1.7%
AKAM	D	-1.68%
DT	B	-1.67%
CALX	C	-1.64%
IRDM	C	-1.63%
EXTR	D	-1.61%
JNPR	C	-1.6%
NTCT	C	-1.6%
DOX	B	-1.59%
MTSI	B	-1.59%
SWKS	F	-1.57%
INFN	C	-1.57%
IDCC	A	-1.56%
ATEN	B	-1.56%
VIAV	C	-1.56%
MXL	D	-1.55%
NABL	F	-1.55%
HCP	A	-1.54%
SWI	B	-1.53%
DOCN	B	-1.53%
CSGS	B	-1.52%
KD	D	-1.52%
GSAT	F	-1.51%
QRVO	F	-1.51%
TMUS	A	-1.47%
EQIX	C	-1.47%
VZ	C	-1.46%
T	B	-1.44%
AMT	D	-1.41%
CCI	D	-1.39%
NPAB	D	-1.33%
VSAT	F	-1.21%