XHS vs. EDOC ETF Comparison
Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC)
XHS
SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF
XHS Description
The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$89.34
Average Daily Volume
8,514
56
EDOC
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF
EDOC Description
The Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health ETF (EDOC) seeks to invest in companies positioned to benefit from further advances in the field of telemedicine and digital health. This includes companies involved in Telemedicine, Health Care Analytics, Connected Health Care Devices, and Administrative Digitization.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$8.65
Average Daily Volume
16,117
31
Performance
| Period | XHS | EDOC |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -2.56% | -4.84% |
| 60 Days | 1.02% | -6.13% |
| 90 Days | -1.01% | -3.89% |
| 12 Months | -3.34% | -25.04% |
XHS Overweight 49 Positions Relative to EDOC
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDCO | F | 2.32% | |
| CAH | D | 2.24% | |
| ACHC | F | 2.24% | |
| MCK | B | 2.23% | |
| SEM | A | 2.22% | |
| CI | D | 2.21% | |
| ENSG | A | 2.21% | |
| DVA | C | 2.2% | |
| EHC | A | 2.19% | |
| HCA | B | 2.19% | |
| OPCH | F | 2.19% | |
| HQY | B | 2.18% | |
| AMED | A | 2.18% | |
| CVS | D | 2.18% | |
| HSIC | F | 2.18% | |
| PINC | F | 2.18% | |
| CHE | D | 2.17% | |
| UHS | B | 2.17% | |
| ELV | C | 2.17% | |
| HUM | C | 2.15% | |
| MOH | F | 2.15% | |
| PGNY | D | 2.14% | |
| RDNT | B | 2.14% | |
| CNC | D | 2.13% | |
| UNH | D | 2.12% | |
| GH | C | 2.12% | |
| THC | B | 2.12% | |
| SGRY | F | 2.0% | |
| AGL | D | 1.98% | |
| ADUS | B | 1.82% | |
| OMI | F | 1.75% | |
| BKD | C | 1.6% | |
| NEO | D | 1.42% | |
| CRVL | B | 1.14% | |
| AHCO | D | 1.11% | |
| OPK | F | 0.94% | |
| USPH | F | 0.94% | |
| MD | F | 0.89% | |
| NHC | A | 0.73% | |
| ASTH | C | 0.73% | |
| CCRN | F | 0.73% | |
| ACCD | F | 0.69% | |
| CSTL | D | 0.66% | |
| PETQ | A | 0.66% | |
| MODV | D | 0.65% | |
| CYH | D | 0.56% | |
| ALHC | B | 0.55% | |
| PNTG | A | 0.49% | |
| NRC | F | 0.27% |
XHS Underweight 24 Positions Relative to EDOC
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PODD | C | -4.69% | |
| RMD | D | -4.57% | |
| DOCS | C | -4.47% | |
| TNDM | D | -4.12% | |
| TWST | C | -4.07% | |
| OSCR | D | -4.03% | |
| QGEN | D | -3.97% | |
| A | D | -3.8% | |
| MASI | F | -3.77% | |
| IRTC | D | -3.56% | |
| IQV | F | -3.5% | |
| ILMN | F | -3.46% | |
| DXCM | F | -3.31% | |
| EVH | F | -2.96% | |
| TDOC | F | -2.44% | |
| VCYT | C | -2.41% | |
| OMCL | F | -1.9% | |
| PHR | F | -1.59% | |
| DH | F | -0.94% | |
| GDRX | B | -0.89% | |
| PACB | F | -0.61% | |
| DCGO | F | -0.39% | |
| LFMD | F | -0.33% | |
| SENS | F | -0.27% |
XHS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
EDOC: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
