VCLN vs. JHMU ETF Comparison
Comparison of Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN) to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU)
VCLN
Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF
VCLN Description
The investment seeks capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund will invest not less than 80% of its net assets (plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities of clean energy companies. The sub-adviser defines clean energy companies as those that derive at least 50% of their value from one or more of the following clean energy businesses: (a) the production of clean energy; (b) the provision of clean energy technology and equipment; or (c) the transmission and distribution of clean energy. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$17.65
Average Daily Volume
558
20
JHMU
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
JHMU Description
The fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities that compose the fund's index. The index is designed to comprise securities in the utilities sector within the U.S. Universe whose market capitalizations are larger than that of the 1001st largest U.S. company at the time of reconstitution. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.50
Average Daily Volume
3,327
10
Performance
| Period | VCLN | JHMU |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -5.66% | -0.73% |
| 60 Days | -8.69% | -0.56% |
| 90 Days | -4.91% | 0.07% |
| 12 Months | 6.39% | 8.48% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in VCLN | Weight in JHMU | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SO | C | 1.71% | 4.69% | 1.71% |
VCLN: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
JHMU: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
