VCLN vs. DEEP ETF Comparison

Comparison of Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF (VCLN) to Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP)

VCLN

Virtus Duff & Phelps Clean Energy ETF

VCLN Description

The investment seeks capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund will invest not less than 80% of its net assets (plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities of clean energy companies. The sub-adviser defines clean energy companies as those that derive at least 50% of their value from one or more of the following clean energy businesses: (a) the production of clean energy; (b) the provision of clean energy technology and equipment; or (c) the transmission and distribution of clean energy. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$17.75

Average Daily Volume

1,036

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

DEEP

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF

DEEP Description

The investment seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Acquirers Deep Value Index (the “index”). The index was established in 2020 by Acquirers Funds LLC and tracks the performance of a portfolio of 20 of the most undervalued, fundamentally strong stocks drawn from the largest 500 stocks listed in the United States meeting certain liquidity thresholds. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund’s total assets (exclusive of any collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.56

Average Daily Volume

1,673

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	VCLN	DEEP
30 Days	-9.76%	-5.31%
60 Days	-1.34%	-3.18%
90 Days	3.74%	-3.88%
12 Months	-13.97%	3.55%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in VCLN	Weight in DEEP	Overlap
	AGX	C	2.04%	1.01%	1.01%

VCLN Overweight 23 Positions Relative to DEEP

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FSLR	C	8.61%
ENPH	F	7.28%
ED	D	3.24%
NEE	D	3.22%
ENLC	B	2.85%
RUN	F	2.78%
TEL	B	2.57%
AES	D	2.53%
ABBV	C	2.51%
GTLS	D	2.15%
SO	B	2.04%
CWEN	D	1.95%
ETR	D	1.74%
GEV	B	1.71%
XYL	D	1.61%
MP	D	1.48%
HUBB	C	1.23%
FLNC	F	1.15%
NVT	D	1.1%
ARRY	F	1.02%
CEG	B	0.77%
SEDG	F	0.76%
PLUG	F	0.6%

VCLN Underweight 95 Positions Relative to DEEP

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SIGA	C	-1.2%
SSP	F	-1.09%
VSTO	B	-1.09%
SBH	D	-1.05%
GEO	B	-1.05%
TBBK	B	-1.04%
INVA	B	-1.03%
TK	C	-1.03%
HTBK	C	-1.03%
RGP	F	-1.03%
USLM	C	-1.03%
NTB	C	-1.02%
TPB	B	-1.02%
ASC	C	-1.02%
PANL	C	-1.02%
GTX	D	-1.02%
WNC	F	-1.02%
SBLK	D	-1.02%
TNK	C	-1.02%
GSL	C	-1.01%
ETD	D	-1.01%
AAN	B	-1.01%
DFIN	D	-1.01%
AMSF	F	-1.01%
AMN	F	-1.01%
EIG	C	-1.01%
BBW	F	-1.01%
NGVT	F	-1.01%
CLW	D	-1.01%
VBTX	C	-1.01%
MOV	D	-1.01%
EVRI	C	-1.01%
DHT	D	-1.01%
WLKP	B	-1.01%
NVEC	D	-1.01%
PRDO	C	-1.01%
WSBF	B	-1.0%
KFRC	D	-1.0%
GIII	F	-1.0%
MHO	D	-1.0%
RGR	F	-1.0%
PLAB	D	-1.0%
CNXN	D	-1.0%
HIBB	A	-1.0%
PFBC	D	-1.0%
MBUU	F	-1.0%
PZZA	F	-1.0%
NATR	F	-1.0%
VIRT	C	-1.0%
SXC	D	-1.0%
CCRN	F	-0.99%
IMKTA	F	-0.99%
APOG	D	-0.99%
IIIN	F	-0.99%
BSIG	C	-0.99%
ACCO	F	-0.99%
RMR	D	-0.99%
ITRN	D	-0.99%
JBSS	D	-0.99%
TH	D	-0.99%
EBF	B	-0.99%
BKE	D	-0.99%
HCKT	D	-0.99%
LPG	C	-0.99%
CMRE	C	-0.99%
RMAX	F	-0.98%
BBSI	B	-0.98%
NRP	B	-0.98%
MCFT	F	-0.98%
SMLR	C	-0.98%
VGR	C	-0.98%
WGO	F	-0.98%
CASS	D	-0.98%
USNA	F	-0.98%
PLPC	F	-0.98%
CRCT	F	-0.98%
MCRI	D	-0.98%
PRG	D	-0.98%
DIN	F	-0.97%
DHIL	F	-0.97%
MD	F	-0.97%
BXC	F	-0.97%
CPRX	D	-0.97%
HVT	F	-0.97%
MED	F	-0.97%
SMP	F	-0.96%
INMD	F	-0.96%
HLF	C	-0.95%
LPRO	F	-0.94%
IMMR	B	-0.93%
HSII	D	-0.92%
AMCX	F	-0.92%
NRC	F	-0.9%
NUS	F	-0.85%
TTEC	F	-0.74%