TMDV vs. PYZ ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) to PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials (PYZ)

TMDV

ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF

TMDV Description

The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the Russell 3000® Dividend Elite Index (the index). The index, constructed and maintained by FTSE International Limited, targets companies that are currently members of the Russell 3000 Index, have increased dividend payments each year for at least 35 years, and meet certain liquidity requirements. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$50.34

Average Daily Volume

342

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PYZ

PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials

PYZ Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Basic Materials Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of stocks of 60 US basic materials companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the business of producing raw materials, including paper or wood products, chemicals, construction materials, and mining and metals. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$97.04

Average Daily Volume

2,416

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	TMDV	PYZ
30 Days	1.36%	0.76%
60 Days	1.76%	4.86%
90 Days	3.11%	6.56%
12 Months	16.06%	24.93%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in TMDV	Weight in PYZ	Overlap
APD	A	1.77%	3.84%	1.77%
FUL	F	1.46%	1.18%	1.18%
NUE	C	1.69%	2.69%	1.69%
RPM	A	1.8%	4.44%	1.8%

TMDV Overweight 58 Positions Relative to PYZ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
EMR	B	2.0%
GWW	B	1.94%
CBSH	B	1.8%
GRC	A	1.79%
UBSI	B	1.77%
TROW	B	1.77%
DOV	A	1.76%
RLI	A	1.76%
ADP	A	1.74%
ABM	B	1.71%
CVX	A	1.71%
ATO	A	1.71%
CSL	C	1.71%
BEN	C	1.71%
ITW	B	1.7%
CINF	A	1.7%
LOW	C	1.69%
WMT	A	1.69%
MSEX	C	1.65%
LANC	C	1.65%
SCL	C	1.63%
ORI	A	1.63%
SHW	B	1.62%
AWR	B	1.62%
NWN	A	1.62%
NDSN	B	1.61%
MSA	F	1.6%
NFG	A	1.59%
MCD	D	1.58%
BKH	A	1.58%
TGT	F	1.57%
ABT	B	1.56%
UVV	B	1.55%
AFL	B	1.55%
BDX	F	1.52%
CLX	A	1.52%
UGI	C	1.51%
MDT	D	1.5%
SYY	D	1.5%
FRT	B	1.5%
SPGI	C	1.5%
PPG	F	1.49%
UHT	D	1.47%
PG	C	1.44%
SJW	F	1.43%
CWT	C	1.43%
ED	C	1.43%
PEP	F	1.42%
JNJ	C	1.42%
HRL	D	1.42%
SON	F	1.41%
MKC	C	1.41%
GPC	D	1.39%
KMB	C	1.37%
SWK	D	1.37%
KO	D	1.36%
ADM	D	1.32%
CL	D	1.29%

TMDV Underweight 43 Positions Relative to PYZ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CRS	B	-5.12%
LIN	C	-3.74%
ATI	C	-3.72%
AVY	F	-3.57%
RS	B	-3.47%
EMN	C	-2.74%
CF	A	-2.7%
LPX	B	-2.67%
SLVM	B	-2.43%
SUM	B	-2.37%
UEC	B	-2.34%
IP	A	-2.29%
AA	A	-2.25%
CBT	D	-2.13%
CDE	C	-2.13%
AVNT	B	-2.11%
CTVA	C	-1.97%
VVV	D	-1.94%
ESI	B	-1.94%
ECL	D	-1.92%
WLK	D	-1.83%
FCX	F	-1.8%
PCT	C	-1.79%
CMC	B	-1.79%
RGLD	C	-1.76%
DD	C	-1.75%
SMG	C	-1.74%
CENX	B	-1.73%
NEM	D	-1.71%
LYB	F	-1.68%
IFF	D	-1.63%
MP	C	-1.61%
HL	D	-1.56%
HWKN	B	-1.48%
DOW	F	-1.47%
PRM	C	-1.36%
BCPC	B	-1.28%
MTRN	C	-1.12%
MTX	B	-1.08%
NEU	D	-1.05%
IOSP	C	-1.01%
SXT	C	-0.96%
WOR	F	-0.9%