TDV vs. XMLV ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) to PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (XMLV)

TDV

ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF

TDV Description

The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats Index (the index). The index, constructed and maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, targets companies from the U.S. technology sector and select U.S. technology-related companies from the communication services and consumer discretionary sectors. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$75.31

Average Daily Volume

16,079

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XMLV

PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio

XMLV Description

The PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is compiled, maintained and calculated by Standard & Poor's, consisting of 80 out of 400 medium-capitalization range securities from the S&P MidCap 400 Index with the lowest realized volatility over the past 12 months. Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down asset price fluctuations over time. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$54.58

Average Daily Volume

34,389

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	TDV	XMLV
30 Days	3.21%	-1.60%
60 Days	7.25%	-2.02%
90 Days	7.69%	-1.16%
12 Months	17.22%	9.12%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in TDV	Weight in XMLV	Overlap
	DLB	D	2.61%	1.09%	1.09%

TDV Overweight 34 Positions Relative to XMLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AVGO	B	3.39%
AAPL	A	3.34%
KLAC	B	3.34%
HPQ	C	3.22%
QCOM	B	3.19%
GLW	B	3.18%
ADI	B	3.18%
APH	B	3.16%
ORCL	A	3.14%
CGNX	B	3.12%
TXN	B	3.12%
LRCX	B	3.12%
MSI	B	2.93%
MSFT	A	2.92%
LFUS	C	2.9%
SWKS	C	2.83%
POWI	D	2.83%
MCHP	C	2.82%
AVT	D	2.81%
INTU	A	2.78%
TEL	B	2.73%
ROP	B	2.71%
BMI	C	2.71%
BR	B	2.65%
SSNC	B	2.63%
JKHY	C	2.59%
V	C	2.54%
CSCO	D	2.53%
MA	C	2.5%
ACN	D	2.47%
CASS	D	2.46%
CDW	D	2.45%
IBM	B	2.42%
CSGS	F	2.16%

TDV Underweight 79 Positions Relative to XMLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DTM	B	-1.54%
SEIC	D	-1.52%
ATR	D	-1.52%
ADC	B	-1.49%
PNM	D	-1.49%
CW	C	-1.47%
GLPI	B	-1.45%
CACI	B	-1.45%
ORI	D	-1.44%
MUSA	C	-1.42%
NNN	B	-1.41%
INGR	D	-1.39%
EHC	B	-1.39%
POST	C	-1.38%
OGE	C	-1.38%
CASY	B	-1.36%
IDA	D	-1.35%
AM	B	-1.34%
ELS	C	-1.33%
AMH	A	-1.33%
DCI	D	-1.32%
PRI	C	-1.31%
NJR	D	-1.29%
RGA	C	-1.29%
LSTR	D	-1.29%
EGP	B	-1.29%
CVLT	B	-1.28%
EPR	C	-1.28%
MDU	C	-1.28%
NWE	D	-1.28%
ESNT	C	-1.27%
OHI	B	-1.27%
STAG	B	-1.26%
MTG	B	-1.26%
SR	C	-1.26%
AFG	D	-1.25%
ACM	D	-1.24%
GATX	B	-1.23%
RLI	D	-1.23%
TXRH	B	-1.23%
GNTX	D	-1.22%
POR	D	-1.22%
KEX	B	-1.21%
USFD	C	-1.21%
ALE	C	-1.2%
HLI	A	-1.2%
MSM	F	-1.2%
VOYA	D	-1.2%
THG	D	-1.2%
BRX	B	-1.19%
MMS	B	-1.19%
WH	C	-1.19%
SNX	D	-1.18%
GGG	D	-1.18%
CHE	D	-1.18%
SIGI	F	-1.17%
OGS	C	-1.17%
NFG	D	-1.17%
FHI	C	-1.17%
WTRG	C	-1.16%
FR	C	-1.16%
SON	F	-1.15%
SF	B	-1.14%
WEN	F	-1.14%
PFGC	D	-1.14%
WPC	D	-1.13%
COLM	D	-1.12%
KBR	D	-1.11%
UNM	D	-1.1%
ITT	D	-1.09%
VNT	D	-1.09%
NEU	D	-1.09%
BKH	D	-1.09%
ARW	D	-1.08%
RPM	D	-1.07%
GHC	D	-1.06%
PCH	F	-1.05%
FLO	D	-1.05%
LECO	F	-0.94%