TDV vs. CPAI ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) to Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF (CPAI)

TDV

ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF

TDV Description

The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats Index (the index). The index, constructed and maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, targets companies from the U.S. technology sector and select U.S. technology-related companies from the communication services and consumer discretionary sectors. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$76.30

Average Daily Volume

12,213

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

CPAI

Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF

CPAI Description

CPAI employs a quantitative, model-driven strategy that integrates quantitative analysis and machine learning insights to navigate diverse market conditions. The portfolio consists of at least 50 US-listed companies of any capitalization or ADRs. The selection process relies on advanced quantitative models leveraging machine learning technology, considering over 30 variables related to value, long-term reversal, momentum, profitability, investor sentiment, and stock price stability. Additionally, the Adviser backtests variable combinations considered to be supported by economic reasoning or investor behavioral biases. The models continually learn and adapt relationships between input variables and realized historic returns, updating during quarterly portfolio rebalances. Moreover, rebalancing ensures the portfolio aligns with the models' rankings, with adjustments made to limit sector exposure to 35% or less.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$35.34

Average Daily Volume

7,175

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	TDV	CPAI
30 Days	-1.42%	2.73%
60 Days	-0.21%	8.37%
90 Days	1.70%	10.75%
12 Months	18.61%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in TDV	Weight in CPAI	Overlap
AAPL	C	2.64%	1.81%	1.81%
MSFT	D	2.71%	1.83%	1.83%
MSI	A	2.93%	2.07%	2.07%
ORCL	A	2.99%	2.09%	2.09%

TDV Overweight 30 Positions Relative to CPAI

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CSGS	B	3.24%
INTU	B	3.18%
BMI	B	3.16%
CASS	B	3.1%
TXN	C	3.09%
APH	B	3.05%
V	A	3.03%
CGNX	D	3.03%
BR	B	2.9%
POWI	D	2.9%
LRCX	F	2.9%
HPQ	B	2.89%
CSCO	B	2.88%
MA	B	2.87%
GLW	B	2.87%
AVT	C	2.86%
DLB	B	2.86%
ROP	C	2.84%
LFUS	D	2.81%
AVGO	D	2.77%
KLAC	F	2.76%
SSNC	C	2.75%
ADI	D	2.72%
QCOM	F	2.7%
JKHY	D	2.68%
ACN	B	2.67%
MCHP	F	2.57%
IBM	C	2.55%
SWKS	F	2.55%
CDW	F	2.53%

TDV Underweight 45 Positions Relative to CPAI

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SFM	B	-2.51%
SKYW	B	-2.49%
TRGP	A	-2.46%
TDS	B	-2.43%
CARG	B	-2.37%
LDOS	C	-2.33%
NTGR	B	-2.27%
UNM	A	-2.25%
GDDY	A	-2.23%
OKE	A	-2.21%
FTDR	A	-2.17%
BRBR	A	-2.17%
EQH	B	-2.16%
CNO	B	-2.15%
HTZ	C	-2.13%
FTI	A	-2.13%
ACIW	B	-2.11%
VIRT	A	-2.11%
CVLT	A	-2.08%
CAH	B	-2.08%
CLBT	B	-2.06%
COR	B	-2.05%
GOOGL	B	-2.05%
GNW	A	-2.03%
PBI	C	-2.01%
PGR	B	-1.93%
META	C	-1.93%
RTX	D	-1.9%
BRC	C	-1.89%
TJX	A	-1.89%
THC	C	-1.88%
LESL	D	-1.87%
NYT	D	-1.85%
ZIM	B	-1.84%
WBA	F	-1.82%
PAA	B	-1.8%
PAGP	A	-1.79%
WES	C	-1.76%
LLY	F	-1.74%
MHO	D	-1.72%
PRM	C	-1.72%
ROST	D	-1.72%
UHS	D	-1.64%
HCA	F	-1.61%
AGL	F	-0.95%