SEMI vs. INNO ETF Comparison
Comparison of Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF (SEMI) to Harbor Disruptive Innovation ETF (INNO)
SEMI
Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF
SEMI Description
SEMI is designed to provide exposure to the broad information technology sector by focusing on pure-play companies related to the semiconductor industry. The fund actively and generally invests in 30-50 high-conviction semiconductor or semiconductor-related firms, as defined by GICS, including those under communication equipment, electronic equipment, technology hardware, storage and peripherals, and software. Additionally, the fund requires at least 25% of its assets be invested in companies in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industry. Security selection is done through extensive in-depth research. SEMI is a non-transparent ETF and does not provide daily disclosure of its portfolio holdings unlike other ETFs. As such, there is a risk that shares of the fund may trade at wider spreads, especially during periods of volatility. The fund instead publishes a trading basket daily, which provides a preview of selected holdings without disclosing the actual portfolio.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.43
Average Daily Volume
5,084
28
INNO
Harbor Disruptive Innovation ETF
INNO Description
INNO invests in stocks of any size with growth potential linked to disruptive innovation. The fund aims to achieve enhanced risk-adjusted investment outcome by utilizing an active multi-manager approach in which the advisor allocates assets among subadvisors. Each subadvisor represents a strategy that targets associated disruptive companies in technology, advanced therapies, analog-to-digital transition, structural changes and secular trends, and products or services with large demand. The advisor determines and adjusts allocations based on qualitative and quantitative assessments of each strategy, as well as in combination. The fund may invest up to 25% in foreign markets, including developing countries. INNO utilizes the same investment strategy and portfolio management team as its mutual fund counterpart, Harbor Disruptive Innovation Fund.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$15.79
Average Daily Volume
9,942
67
Performance
| Period | SEMI | INNO |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -1.33% | 1.66% |
| 60 Days | 8.86% | 10.50% |
| 90 Days | -9.28% | 0.29% |
| 12 Months | 34.00% | 31.76% |
SEMI Overweight 21 Positions Relative to INNO
SEMI Underweight 60 Positions Relative to INNO
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOW | C | -3.93% | |
| MELI | C | -3.36% | |
| GOOG | B | -3.31% | |
| PGR | C | -3.1% | |
| DHR | C | -2.99% | |
| LIN | B | -2.87% | |
| SHOP | C | -2.87% | |
| AMZN | C | -2.85% | |
| URI | C | -2.81% | |
| DASH | A | -2.47% | |
| IOT | C | -2.21% | |
| MSFT | D | -2.07% | |
| META | A | -2.07% | |
| ASND | C | -1.99% | |
| GOOGL | B | -1.93% | |
| CMG | C | -1.56% | |
| TEAM | D | -1.55% | |
| TOST | C | -1.44% | |
| CGNX | F | -1.27% | |
| NET | D | -1.12% | |
| PCOR | D | -1.09% | |
| DDOG | D | -1.09% | |
| NFLX | A | -1.02% | |
| SAP | C | -0.89% | |
| HUBS | D | -0.89% | |
| MNDY | C | -0.86% | |
| MEDP | F | -0.85% | |
| GTLS | F | -0.84% | |
| SE | B | -0.81% | |
| S | C | -0.78% | |
| PANW | D | -0.72% | |
| LSCC | D | -0.72% | |
| MTSI | B | -0.72% | |
| ICLR | F | -0.71% | |
| ZS | F | -0.69% | |
| MRNA | F | -0.67% | |
| BSY | D | -0.65% | |
| LLY | D | -0.65% | |
| DT | C | -0.64% | |
| ROKU | C | -0.63% | |
| NU | D | -0.61% | |
| MDB | F | -0.61% | |
| CRM | B | -0.6% | |
| GEV | B | -0.57% | |
| PODD | C | -0.56% | |
| SQ | D | -0.54% | |
| OKTA | F | -0.54% | |
| DKNG | D | -0.52% | |
| LEGN | F | -0.51% | |
| HUBB | A | -0.45% | |
| RCKT | F | -0.43% | |
| TSLA | C | -0.4% | |
| SNOW | F | -0.4% | |
| CRWD | D | -0.38% | |
| GLBE | C | -0.37% | |
| SAIA | D | -0.37% | |
| TDG | A | -0.36% | |
| PCVX | B | -0.32% | |
| DXCM | F | -0.31% | |
| BCYC | D | -0.17% |
SEMI: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
INNO: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
