SCLZ vs. ZECP ETF Comparison

Comparison of Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (SCLZ) to Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP)
SCLZ

Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

SCLZ Description

SCLZ aims to maximize income through a portfolio of US dividend-paying companies combined with a covered call writing strategy. This strategy provides a potential buffer against market volatility, although the reduction is limited to the amount of option premium received. Based on the large- and mid-cap stocks of the OShares Focused Quality Dividend Index, the fund selects 50 names based on a composite score for quality and growth characteristics. The composite score considers quality factors, dividend growth, dividend coverage, and dividend yield. Note some stocks with superior dividend payouts and higher capital appreciation potential may be excluded if option premium potential is too low. Quarterly, constituents are re-ranked based on historic dividend yield and potential capital appreciation, with holdings sold when they are no longer listed. Risk management involves establishing pre-defined exit points for each option to reduce downside exposure while maximizing income.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$54.74

Average Daily Volume

1,700

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
ZECP

Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF

ZECP Description The Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF seeks to provide long-term total returns and minimize capital loss. The Fund pursues its investment objective by constructing a portfolio of companies that exhibit a track record of moving through recessionary periods with little to minimal impact on aggregate earnings growth relative to the overall equity market.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$31.94

Average Daily Volume

38,364

Number of Holdings *

61

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period SCLZ ZECP
30 Days 0.58% 2.68%
60 Days 1.63% 3.48%
90 Days 2.59% 5.50%
12 Months 26.08%
24 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in SCLZ Weight in ZECP Overlap
AAPL C 4.96% 6.17% 4.96%
ABT B 1.75% 1.08% 1.08%
ACN C 1.71% 1.67% 1.67%
CAT B 1.76% 2.61% 1.76%
CSCO B 1.93% 0.43% 0.43%
CTAS B 1.37% 2.08% 1.37%
GD F 1.32% 0.89% 0.89%
GOOGL C 5.41% 4.34% 4.34%
HD A 2.48% 2.53% 2.48%
HSY F 1.09% 1.19% 1.09%
INTU C 1.81% 1.25% 1.25%
JNJ D 2.25% 1.31% 1.31%
JPM A 3.37% 2.8% 2.8%
LLY F 2.99% 2.13% 2.13%
MCD D 1.75% 0.99% 0.99%
MMC B 1.43% 2.01% 1.43%
MRK F 1.83% 0.75% 0.75%
MSFT F 4.84% 5.59% 4.84%
ORCL B 2.18% 1.59% 1.59%
PEP F 1.68% 1.58% 1.58%
PG A 2.43% 2.7% 2.43%
TJX A 1.59% 1.06% 1.06%
TXN C 1.76% 1.01% 1.01%
UNH C 2.86% 2.84% 2.84%
SCLZ Overweight 25 Positions Relative to ZECP
Symbol Grade Weight
AVGO D 3.47%
V A 2.85%
MA C 2.49%
KO D 1.89%
PM B 1.8%
QCOM F 1.68%
HON B 1.65%
ADP B 1.53%
MO A 1.49%
SBUX A 1.48%
DE A 1.48%
APH A 1.47%
LMT D 1.44%
ITW B 1.43%
PCAR B 1.42%
AON A 1.42%
SNA A 1.38%
ZTS D 1.32%
MDLZ F 1.28%
PAYX C 1.27%
OTIS C 1.27%
MSCI C 1.26%
CTSH B 1.23%
YUM B 1.2%
CBOE B 1.16%
SCLZ Underweight 37 Positions Relative to ZECP
Symbol Grade Weight
WMT A -2.58%
AXP A -2.55%
SNPS B -2.39%
NFLX A -2.38%
AMP A -1.99%
HIG B -1.82%
RCL A -1.81%
RSG A -1.72%
AEP D -1.71%
AMAT F -1.65%
MET A -1.39%
MAR B -1.38%
TFC A -1.36%
RTX C -1.34%
CDNS B -1.33%
MCO B -1.33%
PHM D -1.25%
FI A -1.24%
AMGN D -1.2%
BSX B -1.15%
PNC B -1.15%
SYK C -1.12%
SO D -1.04%
AWK D -1.02%
TMO F -0.98%
WRB A -0.96%
BLK C -0.91%
MAA B -0.89%
IBM C -0.86%
LH C -0.85%
NEE D -0.81%
CHD B -0.81%
CAH B -0.77%
BMY B -0.72%
PLD D -0.68%
DHR F -0.64%
NDAQ A -0.45%
Compare ETFs