SBIO vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
SBIO

ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF

SBIO Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond (before fees and expenses) generally to the performance of its underlying index, the Poliwogg Medical Breakthroughs IndexSM. The fund employs a "passive management" - or indexing - investment approach designed to track the performance of the underlying index. It will normally invest at least 80% of its net assets in securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is comprised of small- and mid-cap stocks of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies that have one or more drugs in either Phase II or Phase III U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trials. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$37.20

Average Daily Volume

8,661

Number of Holdings *

83

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.54

Average Daily Volume

192,476

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period SBIO PGJ
30 Days -5.42% -5.37%
60 Days -4.09% 13.12%
90 Days 0.49% 17.78%
12 Months 48.12% 2.29%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in SBIO Weight in PGJ Overlap
ZLAB C 1.79% 0.77% 0.77%
SBIO Overweight 82 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
CORT B 3.66%
KRYS C 3.39%
RNA C 3.29%
ACLX C 3.19%
ALKS C 3.15%
CRNX C 2.95%
IMVT F 2.66%
DNLI D 2.36%
MRUS F 2.21%
AGIO C 2.05%
PTCT B 2.02%
XENE D 2.01%
VRNA B 1.98%
FOLD F 1.95%
EWTX C 1.92%
ACAD C 1.89%
VERA C 1.82%
VCEL B 1.73%
PTGX D 1.61%
CGON F 1.57%
IDYA F 1.53%
GERN D 1.48%
MIRM B 1.47%
KROS D 1.4%
LBPH A 1.4%
AKRO B 1.32%
MNKD C 1.26%
IRON B 1.21%
GLPG F 1.19%
TARS C 1.16%
IMCR D 1.07%
CLDX F 1.06%
ARVN F 1.06%
BCRX D 0.99%
XNCR B 0.98%
RCUS F 0.95%
NTLA F 0.94%
SNDX F 0.93%
SPRY C 0.88%
VRDN D 0.84%
KURA F 0.83%
DAWN D 0.82%
AUPH B 0.78%
PHVS C 0.76%
APLT C 0.72%
COGT D 0.69%
ETNB C 0.57%
LQDA F 0.54%
PLRX D 0.53%
PRTA F 0.52%
ERAS C 0.51%
REPL D 0.5%
IRWD F 0.44%
AVXL B 0.42%
ANNX F 0.4%
MLYS F 0.39%
ALT C 0.37%
OLMA F 0.37%
ANAB F 0.36%
FLGT F 0.35%
ALLO F 0.35%
CELC F 0.34%
YMAB F 0.34%
URGN F 0.34%
SVRA F 0.34%
FULC F 0.33%
TBPH B 0.32%
FDMT F 0.31%
GHRS C 0.31%
ARCT F 0.31%
AURA C 0.3%
ALEC F 0.28%
CMPS F 0.23%
ACIU D 0.22%
VNDA C 0.2%
ITOS F 0.19%
STRO F 0.17%
ALDX D 0.17%
ZNTL F 0.17%
ENTA F 0.14%
INZY F 0.12%
HLVX F 0.06%
SBIO Underweight 53 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
YUMC C -9.52%
TCOM B -8.84%
JD D -8.37%
BABA D -7.56%
BIDU F -6.21%
BEKE D -4.54%
NTES D -3.64%
TME D -3.6%
ZTO F -3.39%
NIO F -3.36%
VIPS F -3.32%
HTHT D -3.26%
YMM C -3.11%
LI F -2.65%
BZ F -2.57%
QFIN A -2.33%
TAL F -2.25%
XPEV C -1.55%
GDS C -1.34%
BILI D -1.27%
ATAT C -1.18%
ATHM C -1.06%
DQ F -0.87%
MOMO D -0.68%
RLX C -0.67%
IQ F -0.67%
FINV B -0.65%
MNSO D -0.53%
JKS F -0.48%
CSIQ F -0.45%
EH D -0.45%
WB D -0.44%
TIGR D -0.43%
DDL C -0.34%
VNET B -0.28%
QD B -0.27%
LX B -0.26%
SOHU F -0.25%
NOAH D -0.24%
GOTU F -0.23%
KC B -0.19%
RERE C -0.18%
HUYA F -0.17%
API B -0.15%
DAO B -0.11%
DOYU C -0.11%
TUYA D -0.11%
WDH F -0.1%
DADA F -0.09%
BZUN F -0.07%
CAAS C -0.07%
NIU F -0.06%
CBAT F -0.05%
Compare ETFs