RUNN vs. RSPH ETF Comparison
Comparison of Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH)
RUNN
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF
RUNN Description
The fund is in an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF"). Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in exchange-traded equity securities of large and mid-sized U.S. companies with market capitalizations of at least $5 billion. The fund is roughly equally-weighted with 50-75 stocks typically held in the portfolio. The fund may invest up to 20% of net assets in non-U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$35.38
Average Daily Volume
44,462
55
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
RSPH Description
The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is composed of all of the components of the S&P 500® Health Care Index, an index that contains the common stocks of all companies included in the S&P 500® Index that are classified as members of the health care sector, as defined according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS).Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$31.04
Average Daily Volume
61,472
61
Performance
| Period | RUNN | RSPH |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 6.37% | 0.91% |
| 60 Days | 6.34% | -2.88% |
| 90 Days | 8.73% | -2.56% |
| 12 Months | 32.80% | 13.02% |
RUNN Overweight 48 Positions Relative to RSPH
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FI | A | 1.95% | |
| RBA | B | 1.92% | |
| EME | B | 1.92% | |
| HON | B | 1.9% | |
| AME | A | 1.89% | |
| WSO | A | 1.88% | |
| ETN | A | 1.87% | |
| PRI | A | 1.87% | |
| V | A | 1.86% | |
| APD | A | 1.86% | |
| ITT | A | 1.86% | |
| PH | A | 1.86% | |
| FDS | B | 1.85% | |
| GWW | A | 1.84% | |
| TXRH | A | 1.83% | |
| BR | A | 1.83% | |
| TDY | B | 1.82% | |
| SAIA | C | 1.81% | |
| ADP | B | 1.81% | |
| GGG | B | 1.79% | |
| BRO | B | 1.79% | |
| CW | B | 1.79% | |
| DECK | A | 1.78% | |
| RSG | A | 1.77% | |
| ACN | B | 1.77% | |
| IR | A | 1.77% | |
| NSC | A | 1.75% | |
| DRI | B | 1.75% | |
| TJX | A | 1.74% | |
| GOOG | C | 1.73% | |
| FELE | B | 1.72% | |
| SSNC | A | 1.72% | |
| TTC | D | 1.71% | |
| AJG | A | 1.71% | |
| TSCO | C | 1.7% | |
| NVT | B | 1.7% | |
| J | F | 1.69% | |
| ROP | B | 1.68% | |
| CSL | B | 1.68% | |
| ICE | D | 1.65% | |
| MMC | A | 1.65% | |
| DOX | D | 1.62% | |
| FCN | D | 1.61% | |
| GD | F | 1.61% | |
| AVY | D | 1.6% | |
| LDOS | D | 1.57% | |
| ICLR | F | 1.56% | |
| CACI | D | 1.5% |
RUNN Underweight 54 Positions Relative to RSPH
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| INCY | C | -2.08% | |
| BMY | B | -2.02% | |
| MCK | C | -2.0% | |
| WAT | B | -1.96% | |
| WST | C | -1.91% | |
| PODD | B | -1.9% | |
| GILD | B | -1.89% | |
| ISRG | C | -1.86% | |
| VTRS | B | -1.84% | |
| DXCM | C | -1.83% | |
| LH | B | -1.83% | |
| CAH | B | -1.82% | |
| ZBH | C | -1.74% | |
| DGX | B | -1.73% | |
| COR | C | -1.72% | |
| VRTX | D | -1.69% | |
| ABT | B | -1.68% | |
| CTLT | B | -1.68% | |
| CRL | C | -1.68% | |
| SOLV | C | -1.65% | |
| TECH | C | -1.65% | |
| EW | C | -1.64% | |
| RVTY | D | -1.62% | |
| GEHC | F | -1.62% | |
| MDT | D | -1.62% | |
| HOLX | D | -1.62% | |
| HSIC | B | -1.61% | |
| A | D | -1.61% | |
| CVS | D | -1.61% | |
| DVA | B | -1.6% | |
| RMD | C | -1.58% | |
| JNJ | D | -1.56% | |
| ALGN | D | -1.55% | |
| ZTS | D | -1.55% | |
| MTD | F | -1.52% | |
| PFE | D | -1.51% | |
| AMGN | D | -1.51% | |
| HUM | C | -1.5% | |
| HCA | F | -1.49% | |
| TMO | F | -1.48% | |
| DHR | D | -1.48% | |
| ABBV | D | -1.48% | |
| UHS | D | -1.47% | |
| MOH | F | -1.45% | |
| IDXX | F | -1.44% | |
| MRK | F | -1.44% | |
| LLY | F | -1.44% | |
| BIIB | F | -1.43% | |
| BAX | F | -1.36% | |
| TFX | F | -1.32% | |
| CNC | F | -1.32% | |
| ELV | F | -1.26% | |
| REGN | F | -1.15% | |
| MRNA | F | -0.99% |
RUNN: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
RSPH: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
