RUNN vs. QTUM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM)

RUNN

Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF

RUNN Description

The fund is in an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF"). Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in exchange-traded equity securities of large and mid-sized U.S. companies with market capitalizations of at least $5 billion. The fund is roughly equally-weighted with 50-75 stocks typically held in the portfolio. The fund may invest up to 20% of net assets in non-U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.57

Average Daily Volume

41,599

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QTUM

Defiance Quantum ETF

QTUM Description

The investment seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index (the "index"). Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund's total assets (exclusive of any collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index or in depositary receipts representing such component securities. The index consists of a modified equal-weighted portfolio of the stock of companies whose products or services are predominantly tied to the development of quantum computing and machine learning technology. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$65.76

Average Daily Volume

32,929

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RUNN	QTUM
30 Days	1.62%	5.00%
60 Days	5.78%	8.81%
90 Days	8.51%	7.69%
12 Months	31.56%	33.27%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RUNN	Weight in QTUM	Overlap
	ACN	B	1.67%	1.77%	1.67%
	HON	B	1.71%	1.46%	1.46%

RUNN Overweight 53 Positions Relative to QTUM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
EME	B	2.28%
SAIA	B	2.26%
GWW	B	2.04%
LDOS	C	2.02%
ETN	B	2.01%
CW	C	2.0%
PH	A	1.98%
FI	A	1.97%
NVT	C	1.97%
TXRH	A	1.92%
IR	A	1.9%
CACI	C	1.9%
J	D	1.89%
ITT	A	1.86%
AME	A	1.84%
WSO	B	1.83%
PRI	B	1.82%
FELE	B	1.82%
ADP	A	1.81%
GOOG	C	1.8%
DECK	B	1.8%
TDY	B	1.79%
CSL	B	1.79%
FDS	A	1.79%
APD	B	1.79%
GGG	B	1.78%
V	A	1.77%
NSC	B	1.76%
DRI	B	1.74%
RBA	B	1.72%
BSX	A	1.71%
TSCO	D	1.71%
DOX	C	1.7%
BRO	B	1.7%
BR	A	1.68%
TTC	F	1.67%
GD	C	1.67%
SYK	A	1.65%
BDX	F	1.64%
SSNC	C	1.63%
RSG	B	1.62%
ROP	A	1.62%
UNH	B	1.6%
TJX	A	1.58%
AJG	A	1.58%
MMC	D	1.57%
ICE	C	1.54%
STE	D	1.52%
AVY	F	1.5%
FCN	F	1.45%
IQV	F	1.43%
CI	D	1.42%
ICLR	F	1.15%

RUNN Underweight 48 Positions Relative to QTUM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MSTR	B	-2.3%
COHR	C	-1.94%
BABA	D	-1.86%
NOK	C	-1.81%
IBM	D	-1.79%
BAH	C	-1.78%
RGTI	B	-1.78%
NOC	D	-1.75%
MRVL	B	-1.74%
LMT	D	-1.74%
WIT	B	-1.71%
QBTS	B	-1.71%
TSM	C	-1.65%
RTX	D	-1.63%
NVDA	A	-1.63%
JNPR	D	-1.61%
RDNT	B	-1.61%
TXN	B	-1.49%
ABBV	F	-1.45%
BIDU	F	-1.42%
GOOGL	C	-1.4%
HPE	B	-1.4%
CDNS	B	-1.37%
MSFT	C	-1.36%
ON	F	-1.35%
ADI	D	-1.33%
SNPS	C	-1.29%
AMD	F	-1.29%
NVEC	D	-1.23%
TDC	F	-1.23%
CRUS	F	-1.21%
LSCC	D	-1.19%
KLAC	F	-1.18%
NXPI	F	-1.16%
MCHP	F	-1.16%
AMAT	F	-1.15%
QCOM	F	-1.13%
ONTO	F	-1.13%
INTC	C	-1.11%
MU	D	-1.1%
LRCX	F	-1.08%
MKSI	C	-1.08%
SYNA	C	-1.06%
ESTC	C	-1.05%
TER	F	-1.04%
FORM	F	-1.0%
ASML	D	-0.92%
STM	F	-0.86%