RPV vs. FTDS ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) to First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS)

RPV

Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

RPV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P 500 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P 500 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$87.80

Average Daily Volume

146,967

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FTDS

First Trust Dividend Strength ETF

FTDS Description

The fund will normally invest at least 90% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in the common stocks and real estate investment companies (?REITs?) that comprise the index. The index is designed to provide exposure to well-capitalized companies with a history of increasing their dividends. The term ?well-capitalized? reflects companies that have strong balance sheets with durable cash flow and a record of profitability.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$51.83

Average Daily Volume

880

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RPV	FTDS
30 Days	-1.33%	-0.65%
60 Days	4.69%	5.33%
90 Days	6.07%	7.29%
12 Months	25.66%	29.37%

10 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RPV	Weight in FTDS	Overlap
ADM	D	1.01%	1.76%	1.01%
BG	F	1.76%	1.65%	1.65%
CINF	A	0.59%	2.17%	0.59%
EG	B	0.56%	1.93%	0.56%
EMN	C	0.6%	2.21%	0.6%
HIG	A	0.78%	2.24%	0.78%
PSX	D	1.48%	1.82%	1.48%
SYY	B	0.52%	2.03%	0.52%
TGT	C	0.56%	2.02%	0.56%
TRV	C	0.54%	2.26%	0.54%

RPV Overweight 82 Positions Relative to FTDS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GM	D	4.16%
BRK.A	C	3.83%
MHK	B	2.77%
UAL	B	2.69%
F	D	2.32%
VTRS	D	2.21%
TSN	D	2.19%
C	B	2.08%
CFG	D	1.96%
IVZ	A	1.91%
KR	C	1.91%
PARA	F	1.85%
VLO	F	1.79%
CNC	F	1.74%
CVS	D	1.7%
KMX	F	1.57%
SW	C	1.54%
NRG	A	1.46%
CI	D	1.43%
HPE	B	1.42%
BBY	B	1.39%
BWA	B	1.36%
UHS	D	1.35%
IP	C	1.34%
TFC	D	1.32%
WBD	D	1.3%
COF	C	1.29%
MCK	F	1.27%
SYF	B	1.2%
CAH	B	1.18%
MTB	C	1.14%
PRU	C	1.06%
LUV	B	1.03%
L	D	1.03%
BK	C	1.02%
BAC	D	0.99%
AIG	F	0.94%
WFC	D	0.93%
KHC	D	0.93%
T	A	0.92%
RF	C	0.88%
HBAN	D	0.88%
STT	C	0.88%
WBA	F	0.87%
KEY	C	0.86%
MOS	D	0.84%
IFF	C	0.8%
TAP	D	0.79%
GS	C	0.77%
MET	A	0.72%
SWK	A	0.7%
FITB	C	0.66%
AIZ	A	0.65%
PNC	C	0.64%
VZ	A	0.63%
BEN	F	0.61%
CAG	D	0.6%
EVRG	C	0.6%
DOW	B	0.59%
FOXA	A	0.58%
ALL	B	0.58%
PNW	A	0.57%
CHRW	A	0.56%
CTVA	A	0.55%
KMI	A	0.55%
ELV	F	0.55%
EQT	B	0.54%
ES	C	0.54%
USB	C	0.53%
HPQ	C	0.52%
PFG	C	0.52%
HSIC	D	0.5%
FDX	D	0.5%
LYB	D	0.5%
ARE	D	0.5%
CVX	B	0.43%
LKQ	F	0.41%
NWSA	D	0.4%
ALB	D	0.38%
HUM	F	0.31%
FOX	A	0.28%
NWS	D	0.13%

RPV Underweight 39 Positions Relative to FTDS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LMT	A	-2.37%
NKE	D	-2.36%
EBAY	A	-2.33%
AFL	A	-2.3%
CF	A	-2.27%
G	A	-2.26%
SF	A	-2.17%
ORI	B	-2.15%
RLI	A	-2.13%
CMI	B	-2.12%
RPM	A	-2.1%
UNM	A	-2.09%
GD	A	-2.04%
SNA	A	-2.04%
DGX	B	-2.03%
IPG	C	-2.02%
CTSH	B	-1.98%
GRMN	D	-1.98%
UNP	D	-1.97%
DKS	D	-1.97%
EQH	C	-1.96%
EWBC	D	-1.95%
GPC	D	-1.95%
PPG	D	-1.94%
BPOP	D	-1.93%
HII	F	-1.9%
CFR	D	-1.9%
EOG	B	-1.88%
TEL	D	-1.88%
HON	C	-1.87%
ROK	D	-1.86%
CBSH	D	-1.84%
DINO	F	-1.81%
ZION	D	-1.81%
COP	D	-1.8%
PCAR	D	-1.77%
CTRA	D	-1.69%
LW	D	-1.63%
DVN	F	-1.62%