RPV vs. COMT ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) to iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT)
RPV

Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

RPV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P 500 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P 500 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$82.69

Average Daily Volume

130,037

Number of Holdings *

94

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
COMT

iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF

COMT Description The investment seeks total return by providing investors with broad commodity exposure. The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in a combination of exchange-traded commodity futures contracts, exchange-traded options on commodity-related futures contracts and exchange-cleared commodity-related swaps (together, "Commodity-Linked Investments") and commodity-related equity securities ("Commodity-Related Equities"), thereby obtaining exposure to the commodities markets. It is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that does not seek to replicate the performance of a specified index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.83

Average Daily Volume

352,963

Number of Holdings *

19

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period RPV COMT
30 Days -1.94% 5.30%
60 Days -2.35% 2.77%
90 Days -4.15% -0.25%
12 Months 9.76% 11.69%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in RPV Weight in COMT Overlap
BAC B 1.04% 1.0% 1.0%
C B 2.17% 1.0% 1.0%
WFC C 1.01% 1.0% 1.0%
RPV Overweight 91 Positions Relative to COMT
Symbol Grade Weight
GM B 4.29%
BRK.A C 3.59%
F B 2.77%
UAL D 2.35%
TSN D 2.18%
VLO D 2.14%
VTRS D 2.11%
BG B 2.04%
MHK D 1.98%
PARA C 1.85%
KR C 1.76%
CFG B 1.75%
CVS D 1.7%
IVZ D 1.69%
CNC D 1.65%
PSX D 1.65%
MCK B 1.62%
WRK C 1.61%
KMX C 1.57%
HPE C 1.56%
CI D 1.44%
NRG D 1.32%
TFC B 1.24%
IP C 1.24%
BWA F 1.24%
WBA F 1.23%
COF D 1.22%
WBD F 1.2%
BBY C 1.2%
UHS C 1.18%
CAH D 1.13%
SYF B 1.12%
AAL F 1.09%
ADM C 1.08%
PRU B 1.08%
LUV D 1.04%
L D 1.03%
AIG D 1.01%
MTB C 1.01%
MOS F 0.96%
BK B 0.89%
KHC D 0.89%
T B 0.83%
HBAN D 0.8%
RF B 0.77%
STT C 0.77%
IFF B 0.76%
KEY C 0.74%
TAP F 0.74%
HIG C 0.72%
GS A 0.72%
BEN F 0.7%
MET D 0.65%
VZ B 0.61%
ELV C 0.6%
DOW D 0.59%
EQT D 0.58%
FITB D 0.58%
FDX B 0.58%
EG D 0.57%
AIZ D 0.57%
PNC C 0.56%
TGT D 0.56%
EVRG D 0.55%
CAG D 0.55%
SWK D 0.54%
EMN D 0.54%
CTVA D 0.53%
HPQ C 0.53%
CINF C 0.53%
KMI B 0.52%
ALL D 0.52%
LYB D 0.52%
PFG D 0.51%
ARE C 0.51%
SYY D 0.51%
PNW C 0.51%
USB D 0.49%
CVX D 0.49%
FOXA B 0.49%
TRV D 0.49%
ES C 0.48%
CHRW C 0.48%
HSIC D 0.46%
BIO D 0.44%
LKQ F 0.44%
NWSA B 0.44%
ALB F 0.4%
HUM C 0.38%
FOX B 0.24%
NWS B 0.14%
RPV Underweight 16 Positions Relative to COMT
Symbol Grade Weight
DE F -1.0%
NEE D -1.0%
TD F -1.0%
HSBC D -1.0%
KDP D -1.0%
DB C -1.0%
WM B -1.0%
SR C -1.0%
PFE C -1.0%
MAR C -1.0%
FI C -1.0%
BNS C -1.0%
CM C -1.0%
MUFG A -1.0%
BMO D -1.0%
NTRS C -1.0%
Compare ETFs