ROM vs. NOBL ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) to ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF (NOBL)

ROM

ProShares Ultra Technology

ROM Description

The investment seeks daily investment results that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Dow Jones U.S. TechnologySM Index. The fund invests in securities and derivatives that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should have similar daily return characteristics as two times (2x) the daily return of the index. The index measures the performance of the technology sector of the U.S. equity market. Component companies include, among others, those involved in computers and office equipment, software, communications technology, semiconductors, diversified technology services and Internet services. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$70.50

Average Daily Volume

35,837

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

NOBL

ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats ETF

NOBL Description

The investment seeks investment results before fees and expenses that track the performance of the S&P 500Â® Dividend AristocratsÂ® Index (the "index"). The fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities (i.e., securities of the index and comparable securities that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities of the index). The index contains a minimum of 40 stocks, which are equally weighted, and no single sector is allowed to comprise more than 30% of the index weight.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$107.88

Average Daily Volume

423,177

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	ROM	NOBL
30 Days	3.58%	1.07%
60 Days	8.67%	1.14%
90 Days	6.06%	3.79%
12 Months	44.73%	20.86%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in ROM	Weight in NOBL	Overlap
	IBM	C	1.5%	1.45%	1.45%
	ROP	B	0.47%	1.54%	0.47%

ROM Overweight 66 Positions Relative to NOBL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NVDA	C	10.63%
AAPL	C	10.41%
MSFT	F	9.39%
AVGO	D	3.08%
CRM	B	2.5%
ORCL	B	2.33%
CSCO	B	1.84%
ADBE	C	1.77%
ACN	C	1.76%
AMD	F	1.73%
NOW	A	1.65%
INTU	C	1.53%
TXN	C	1.46%
QCOM	F	1.42%
AMAT	F	1.11%
PLTR	B	1.05%
PANW	C	0.99%
MU	D	0.85%
INTC	D	0.82%
ADI	D	0.81%
ANET	C	0.77%
LRCX	F	0.72%
APH	A	0.67%
KLAC	D	0.66%
MSI	B	0.65%
CDNS	B	0.63%
SNPS	B	0.63%
CRWD	B	0.62%
ADSK	A	0.51%
FTNT	C	0.47%
NXPI	D	0.44%
FICO	B	0.44%
IT	C	0.32%
DELL	C	0.3%
CTSH	B	0.3%
HPQ	B	0.29%
GLW	B	0.28%
MCHP	D	0.27%
ANSS	B	0.23%
HPE	B	0.22%
ON	D	0.22%
MPWR	F	0.22%
KEYS	A	0.21%
TYL	B	0.2%
GDDY	A	0.2%
CDW	F	0.19%
NTAP	C	0.19%
PTC	A	0.18%
TDY	B	0.17%
ZBRA	B	0.16%
STX	D	0.16%
FSLR	F	0.16%
WDC	D	0.16%
TRMB	B	0.14%
GEN	B	0.13%
TER	D	0.13%
JBL	B	0.12%
VRSN	F	0.12%
AKAM	D	0.11%
SWKS	F	0.11%
EPAM	C	0.11%
FFIV	B	0.11%
JNPR	F	0.1%
SMCI	F	0.07%
ENPH	F	0.06%
QRVO	F	0.05%

ROM Underweight 63 Positions Relative to NOBL

Symbol	Grade	Weight
EMR	A	-1.81%
GPC	D	-1.67%
CINF	A	-1.67%
ALB	C	-1.66%
DOV	A	-1.65%
BEN	C	-1.64%
FAST	B	-1.64%
GWW	B	-1.64%
CHD	B	-1.63%
PNR	A	-1.62%
CVX	A	-1.62%
CAH	B	-1.62%
TROW	B	-1.61%
CLX	B	-1.61%
ITW	B	-1.6%
NUE	C	-1.58%
TGT	F	-1.58%
BRO	B	-1.58%
KVUE	A	-1.57%
CTAS	B	-1.57%
SHW	A	-1.57%
ADP	B	-1.56%
ATO	A	-1.56%
CHRW	C	-1.56%
SPGI	C	-1.55%
WMT	A	-1.54%
APD	A	-1.54%
NDSN	B	-1.54%
SYY	B	-1.54%
XOM	B	-1.53%
EXPD	D	-1.53%
PG	A	-1.53%
ABT	B	-1.53%
AFL	B	-1.52%
LOW	D	-1.52%
ESS	B	-1.52%
KMB	D	-1.51%
CAT	B	-1.51%
FRT	B	-1.5%
CB	C	-1.49%
PPG	F	-1.47%
ECL	D	-1.46%
MDT	D	-1.46%
MCD	D	-1.46%
MKC	D	-1.44%
CL	D	-1.44%
GD	F	-1.44%
SJM	D	-1.43%
LIN	D	-1.43%
JNJ	D	-1.43%
HRL	D	-1.43%
BDX	F	-1.42%
WST	C	-1.41%
AOS	F	-1.41%
ADM	D	-1.41%
NEE	D	-1.4%
AMCR	D	-1.39%
KO	D	-1.39%
PEP	F	-1.39%
ED	D	-1.37%
O	D	-1.36%
ABBV	D	-1.33%
SWK	D	-1.28%