RODM vs. FNDF ETF Comparison

Comparison of Lattice Developed Markets (ex-US) Strategy ETF (RODM) to Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF)

RODM

Lattice Developed Markets (ex-US) Strategy ETF

RODM Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond to the total return performance of the Lattice Risk-Optimized Developed Markets (ex-US) Strategy Index (LRODMX). The fund generally invests at least 80 percent of its assets in securities of the index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the index. The index is designed to address risks and opportunities within developed international economies outside the U.S. by selecting equity securities of companies domiciled within developed international equity markets exhibiting a favorable combination of factor characteristics.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.47

Average Daily Volume

60,824

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FNDF

Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF

FNDF Description

The investment seeks to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. The index selects, ranks, and weights securities by fundamental measures of company size - adjusted sales, retained operating cash flow, and dividends plus buybacks - rather than market capitalization. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets in stocks included in the index, including depositary receipts representing securities of the index. It may invest up to 10% of its net assets in securities not included in the index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.88

Average Daily Volume

755,253

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RODM	FNDF
30 Days	-1.16%	-3.11%
60 Days	-2.38%	-5.32%
90 Days	-1.93%	-5.68%
12 Months	16.77%	10.21%

16 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RODM	Weight in FNDF	Overlap
ABBV	F	0.04%	0.22%	0.04%
CCEP	C	0.27%	0.02%	0.02%
CHKP	C	0.29%	0.02%	0.02%
CNI	F	0.02%	0.19%	0.02%
DEO	F	0.27%	0.17%	0.17%
E	F	0.08%	0.43%	0.08%
GOLD	C	0.12%	0.16%	0.12%
HSBH	B	1.01%	0.79%	0.79%
LYG	D	0.44%	0.34%	0.34%
MFG	A	0.72%	0.27%	0.27%
MUFG	B	0.05%	0.48%	0.05%
NVS	F	0.87%	0.59%	0.59%
OTEX	F	0.13%	0.03%	0.03%
SMFG	B	0.45%	0.39%	0.39%
STLA	F	0.08%	0.35%	0.08%
UL	D	0.46%	0.56%	0.46%

RODM Overweight 5 Positions Relative to FNDF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NOK	D	0.94%
GSK	F	0.77%
AZN	F	0.73%
RBA	A	0.2%
BP	D	0.17%

RODM Underweight 35 Positions Relative to FNDF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TM	F	-1.24%
HMC	F	-0.57%
SONY	B	-0.48%
TD	D	-0.42%
BCS	A	-0.42%
MT	B	-0.28%
MDT	D	-0.23%
SHG	C	-0.18%
KB	B	-0.18%
KEP	B	-0.11%
WFG	C	-0.1%
AGCO	D	-0.09%
BNTX	C	-0.09%
NMR	B	-0.08%
ZIM	C	-0.07%
SW	A	-0.07%
WCN	A	-0.07%
TT	A	-0.06%
NXPI	D	-0.06%
LPL	D	-0.06%
FLUT	A	-0.05%
APTV	F	-0.04%
LOGI	D	-0.04%
AER	A	-0.03%
GRMN	B	-0.03%
LULU	C	-0.03%
KT	A	-0.03%
SKM	C	-0.03%
ALLE	C	-0.02%
ARM	F	-0.02%
TEVA	C	-0.02%
PRGO	C	-0.02%
TIGO	D	-0.02%
ALV	C	-0.02%
ICLR	D	-0.01%