RFG vs. WBIF ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) to WBI Large Cap Tactical Value Shares (WBIF)

RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$49.40

Average Daily Volume

28,488

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

WBIF

WBI Large Cap Tactical Value Shares

WBIF Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation and the potential for current income, while also seeking to protect principal during unfavorable market conditions. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities of large capitalization domestic and foreign companies which WBI Investments, Inc., the sub-advisor to the fund and an affiliate of Millington Securities Inc., the advisor, believes display an attractive discount in a company's intrinsic value relative to its market price, and up to 20% of its net assets in other tactical investment opportunities.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.40

Average Daily Volume

1,099

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFG	WBIF
30 Days	6.13%	2.05%
60 Days	8.58%	7.25%
90 Days	2.63%	1.34%
12 Months	30.71%	13.13%

9 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFG	Weight in WBIF	Overlap
BYD	B	0.52%	1.39%	0.52%
CASY	D	1.04%	1.22%	1.04%
EXP	C	1.46%	1.29%	1.29%
FIX	A	2.46%	3.12%	2.46%
NEU	F	0.95%	0.55%	0.55%
OC	C	1.48%	1.28%	1.28%
PRI	A	0.95%	1.28%	0.95%
TOL	C	2.13%	0.56%	0.56%
TXRH	A	1.18%	1.2%	1.18%

RFG Overweight 77 Positions Relative to WBIF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CNX	A	2.9%
DUOL	B	2.89%
SWN	D	2.15%
RYAN	A	2.13%
AAON	A	2.06%
WING	C	2.03%
BLD	D	1.9%
EME	B	1.79%
LNTH	C	1.78%
MUSA	D	1.73%
APPF	C	1.72%
H	B	1.67%
KNSL	B	1.55%
CLH	B	1.54%
ONTO	B	1.54%
MEDP	F	1.49%
PR	D	1.48%
WFRD	F	1.44%
SSD	B	1.31%
DT	B	1.3%
ELF	F	1.27%
PK	D	1.25%
FN	B	1.24%
ANF	D	1.21%
LII	C	1.18%
VVV	D	1.17%
RS	D	1.17%
CHDN	C	1.16%
CROX	C	1.15%
RRC	D	1.13%
WSM	C	1.12%
COKE	C	1.12%
MANH	A	1.1%
NVT	C	1.1%
FND	C	1.09%
UFPI	C	1.08%
SKX	B	1.04%
VAL	F	1.02%
OLED	B	0.99%
WLK	C	0.98%
TPX	C	0.98%
SAIA	D	0.96%
OVV	D	0.96%
CELH	F	0.96%
EXEL	B	0.95%
CHRD	F	0.94%
ESAB	C	0.94%
AIT	B	0.92%
RMBS	F	0.92%
RBA	D	0.89%
LOPE	D	0.87%
WSO	C	0.86%
PSTG	F	0.83%
ALTR	B	0.82%
PLNT	B	0.81%
CR	A	0.8%
RBC	C	0.79%
GTLS	D	0.77%
BCO	C	0.75%
CIVI	F	0.75%
WMS	D	0.74%
LECO	D	0.71%
ACHC	F	0.7%
MTDR	D	0.69%
HLNE	A	0.69%
HALO	D	0.68%
LNW	F	0.67%
TREX	D	0.67%
QLYS	F	0.66%
VNT	F	0.58%
DBX	C	0.55%
ARWR	F	0.55%
PEN	D	0.53%
FCN	C	0.51%
COTY	F	0.45%
CAR	D	0.38%
FIVE	D	0.37%

RFG Underweight 60 Positions Relative to WBIF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BDX	C	-3.27%
DTE	B	-3.26%
UNM	A	-3.21%
VOYA	A	-3.21%
WRB	C	-3.2%
CI	D	-3.16%
RGA	B	-3.09%
UHS	D	-3.05%
PRU	B	-2.99%
CMS	A	-2.98%
OXY	D	-2.89%
LRCX	D	-1.52%
AMAT	C	-1.5%
LEN	C	-1.48%
MCK	F	-1.48%
AXP	A	-1.48%
V	B	-1.47%
CSL	A	-1.47%
MPC	D	-1.46%
PHM	C	-1.45%
DHI	C	-1.44%
SLB	D	-1.43%
ADP	A	-1.43%
MLI	B	-1.38%
PAG	D	-1.37%
NXST	D	-1.35%
AME	C	-1.33%
PAYX	B	-1.32%
DKS	D	-1.31%
BR	B	-1.29%
RMD	C	-1.28%
G	A	-1.27%
R	C	-1.26%
HRB	C	-1.22%
LPX	C	-1.22%
KBR	A	-1.2%
FLTR	A	-0.77%
FALN	B	-0.77%
AGZD	A	-0.76%
DFS	A	-0.72%
FTSL	A	-0.7%
SYF	A	-0.57%
EG	A	-0.57%
ALSN	A	-0.57%
DOX	B	-0.56%
IPG	D	-0.56%
AVY	D	-0.56%
EQH	B	-0.55%
STIP	B	-0.55%
ALLE	A	-0.55%
TTC	F	-0.55%
GPI	C	-0.55%
DCI	B	-0.55%
CBT	B	-0.55%
SCI	D	-0.54%
THG	A	-0.54%
NOV	F	-0.53%
GL	C	-0.53%
AOS	C	-0.43%
BKLN	A	-0.32%