RFG vs. WBIF ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) to WBI Large Cap Tactical Value Shares (WBIF)

RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$52.61

Average Daily Volume

17,043

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

WBIF

WBI Large Cap Tactical Value Shares

WBIF Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation and the potential for current income, while also seeking to protect principal during unfavorable market conditions. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities of large capitalization domestic and foreign companies which WBI Investments, Inc., the sub-advisor to the fund and an affiliate of Millington Securities Inc., the advisor, believes display an attractive discount in a company's intrinsic value relative to its market price, and up to 20% of its net assets in other tactical investment opportunities.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$30.24

Average Daily Volume

1,622

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFG	WBIF
30 Days	8.80%	3.91%
60 Days	6.30%	3.66%
90 Days	6.63%	4.44%
12 Months	34.64%	13.34%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFG	Weight in WBIF	Overlap
CASY	A	1.11%	1.28%	1.11%
FIX	A	2.75%	4.58%	2.75%
PRI	A	1.06%	1.42%	1.06%
TOL	B	2.15%	0.54%	0.54%
TXRH	C	1.31%	1.33%	1.31%

RFG Overweight 81 Positions Relative to WBIF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CNX	A	3.65%
DUOL	A	3.18%
AAON	B	2.56%
RYAN	B	2.28%
EME	C	2.07%
MUSA	A	1.84%
APPF	B	1.67%
PR	B	1.67%
OC	A	1.65%
BLD	D	1.64%
H	B	1.61%
KNSL	B	1.6%
CLH	B	1.56%
EXP	A	1.55%
WING	D	1.5%
MEDP	D	1.41%
WFRD	D	1.4%
ELF	C	1.38%
LNTH	D	1.31%
DT	C	1.29%
ANF	C	1.27%
RS	B	1.25%
RRC	B	1.25%
EXEL	B	1.24%
SSD	D	1.24%
PK	B	1.22%
FN	D	1.22%
CHDN	B	1.21%
LII	A	1.17%
SAIA	B	1.16%
VVV	F	1.16%
NVT	B	1.13%
OVV	B	1.13%
RMBS	C	1.11%
AIT	A	1.1%
ESAB	B	1.09%
ONTO	D	1.09%
UFPI	B	1.08%
MANH	D	1.05%
COKE	C	1.05%
RBA	A	1.02%
GTLS	B	1.02%
TPX	B	0.98%
LOPE	B	0.97%
WSM	B	0.96%
CHRD	D	0.94%
NEU	C	0.94%
FND	C	0.93%
PLNT	A	0.93%
VAL	D	0.92%
SKX	D	0.91%
WSO	A	0.89%
ALTR	B	0.89%
CR	A	0.88%
WLK	D	0.83%
MTDR	B	0.83%
RBC	A	0.82%
CELH	F	0.79%
HLNE	B	0.79%
PSTG	D	0.79%
OLED	D	0.78%
CIVI	D	0.77%
CROX	D	0.76%
QLYS	C	0.75%
LECO	B	0.75%
TREX	C	0.69%
LNW	D	0.67%
PEN	B	0.66%
VNT	B	0.66%
ENSG	D	0.62%
WMS	D	0.62%
BCO	D	0.6%
DBX	B	0.59%
BYD	C	0.58%
HALO	F	0.55%
ARWR	F	0.52%
CAR	C	0.45%
FCN	D	0.44%
ACHC	F	0.35%
FIVE	F	0.34%
COTY	F	0.34%

RFG Underweight 38 Positions Relative to WBIF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
WRB	A	-4.74%
UHS	D	-4.68%
KBH	D	-4.54%
NXST	C	-4.43%
V	A	-4.26%
CI	F	-4.26%
DKS	C	-4.24%
PRU	A	-4.14%
ACN	C	-3.98%
UNM	A	-3.93%
MCK	B	-3.93%
AMAT	F	-3.55%
RGA	A	-3.26%
VOYA	B	-3.26%
OXY	D	-2.81%
PHM	D	-2.6%
MMC	B	-2.12%
CF	B	-1.86%
ADP	B	-1.53%
AXP	A	-1.53%
AME	A	-1.46%
G	B	-1.44%
PAYX	C	-1.39%
BR	A	-1.36%
RMD	C	-1.23%
FLTR	A	-0.76%
FALN	B	-0.75%
AGZD	A	-0.75%
FTSL	B	-0.69%
ALSN	B	-0.67%
THG	A	-0.59%
DCI	B	-0.56%
GL	B	-0.55%
STIP	C	-0.54%
ALLE	D	-0.53%
CBT	C	-0.53%
DOX	D	-0.52%
BKLN	A	-0.32%