RFG vs. PRN ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) to PowerShares Dynamic Industrials (PRN)

RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$52.61

Average Daily Volume

17,043

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PRN

PowerShares Dynamic Industrials

PRN Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Industrials Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Industrials Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 60 US industrial companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the business of providing industrial products and services, including engineering heavy machinery, construction, electrical equipment, aerospace and defense and general manufacturing. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$177.44

Average Daily Volume

19,362

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFG	PRN
30 Days	8.80%	11.72%
60 Days	6.30%	16.72%
90 Days	6.63%	23.34%
12 Months	34.64%	64.96%

6 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFG	Weight in PRN	Overlap
AIT	A	1.1%	1.78%	1.1%
CLH	B	1.56%	1.5%	1.5%
EXP	A	1.55%	2.01%	1.55%
FIX	A	2.75%	4.0%	2.75%
UFPI	B	1.08%	1.4%	1.08%
WSO	A	0.89%	3.68%	0.89%

RFG Overweight 80 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CNX	A	3.65%
DUOL	A	3.18%
AAON	B	2.56%
RYAN	B	2.28%
TOL	B	2.15%
EME	C	2.07%
MUSA	A	1.84%
APPF	B	1.67%
PR	B	1.67%
OC	A	1.65%
BLD	D	1.64%
H	B	1.61%
KNSL	B	1.6%
WING	D	1.5%
MEDP	D	1.41%
WFRD	D	1.4%
ELF	C	1.38%
LNTH	D	1.31%
TXRH	C	1.31%
DT	C	1.29%
ANF	C	1.27%
RS	B	1.25%
RRC	B	1.25%
EXEL	B	1.24%
SSD	D	1.24%
PK	B	1.22%
FN	D	1.22%
CHDN	B	1.21%
LII	A	1.17%
SAIA	B	1.16%
VVV	F	1.16%
NVT	B	1.13%
OVV	B	1.13%
RMBS	C	1.11%
CASY	A	1.11%
ESAB	B	1.09%
ONTO	D	1.09%
PRI	A	1.06%
MANH	D	1.05%
COKE	C	1.05%
RBA	A	1.02%
GTLS	B	1.02%
TPX	B	0.98%
LOPE	B	0.97%
WSM	B	0.96%
CHRD	D	0.94%
NEU	C	0.94%
FND	C	0.93%
PLNT	A	0.93%
VAL	D	0.92%
SKX	D	0.91%
ALTR	B	0.89%
CR	A	0.88%
WLK	D	0.83%
MTDR	B	0.83%
RBC	A	0.82%
CELH	F	0.79%
HLNE	B	0.79%
PSTG	D	0.79%
OLED	D	0.78%
CIVI	D	0.77%
CROX	D	0.76%
QLYS	C	0.75%
LECO	B	0.75%
TREX	C	0.69%
LNW	D	0.67%
PEN	B	0.66%
VNT	B	0.66%
ENSG	D	0.62%
WMS	D	0.62%
BCO	D	0.6%
DBX	B	0.59%
BYD	C	0.58%
HALO	F	0.55%
ARWR	F	0.52%
CAR	C	0.45%
FCN	D	0.44%
ACHC	F	0.35%
FIVE	F	0.34%
COTY	F	0.34%

RFG Underweight 34 Positions Relative to PRN

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SMR	B	-5.12%
PWR	A	-3.83%
GWW	B	-3.68%
HEI	B	-3.58%
PH	A	-3.52%
AXON	A	-3.45%
TT	A	-3.33%
CTAS	B	-3.17%
HWM	A	-3.08%
URI	B	-3.08%
PKG	A	-2.88%
STRL	B	-2.85%
FI	A	-2.85%
CSL	C	-2.43%
IRM	D	-2.41%
TDG	D	-2.31%
CSWI	A	-2.25%
DY	D	-2.16%
RSG	A	-2.04%
GE	D	-2.0%
CARR	D	-1.98%
MLI	C	-1.96%
GVA	A	-1.94%
BAH	F	-1.83%
LMB	A	-1.81%
ROAD	A	-1.71%
KAI	A	-1.63%
TTEK	F	-1.49%
ITT	A	-1.45%
TPC	C	-1.45%
VSEC	C	-1.44%
CECO	A	-1.33%
RUSHA	C	-1.32%
FWRD	D	-1.31%