RFG vs. MID ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) to American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID)
RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$50.12

Average Daily Volume

17,033

Number of Holdings *

86

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
MID

American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF

MID Description The investment seeks long-term capital growth. The fund will invest principally in exchange-traded common stocks. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of medium capitalization companies that the portfolio managers believe will create impact by aligning with at least one of the SDGs. The fund may purchase securities of small and large capitalization companies as well. It may engage in active and frequent trading of portfolio securities to achieve its principal investment strategies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$60.90

Average Daily Volume

4,828

Number of Holdings *

40

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period RFG MID
30 Days 0.76% -1.90%
60 Days 1.92% 0.33%
90 Days 5.13% 5.33%
12 Months 29.19% 32.20%
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in RFG Weight in MID Overlap
BLD F 1.64% 0.98% 0.98%
DUOL B 3.18% 4.55% 3.18%
LII A 1.17% 3.48% 1.17%
MANH D 1.05% 3.47% 1.05%
RFG Overweight 82 Positions Relative to MID
Symbol Grade Weight
CNX A 3.65%
FIX A 2.75%
AAON B 2.56%
RYAN B 2.28%
TOL B 2.15%
EME B 2.07%
MUSA A 1.84%
APPF C 1.67%
PR B 1.67%
OC A 1.65%
H B 1.61%
KNSL B 1.6%
CLH C 1.56%
EXP B 1.55%
WING F 1.5%
MEDP D 1.41%
WFRD F 1.4%
ELF C 1.38%
LNTH F 1.31%
TXRH B 1.31%
DT C 1.29%
ANF C 1.27%
RS B 1.25%
RRC B 1.25%
EXEL B 1.24%
SSD D 1.24%
PK D 1.22%
FN C 1.22%
CHDN C 1.21%
SAIA C 1.16%
VVV B 1.16%
NVT C 1.13%
OVV C 1.13%
RMBS C 1.11%
CASY B 1.11%
AIT A 1.1%
ESAB B 1.09%
ONTO F 1.09%
UFPI C 1.08%
PRI A 1.06%
COKE D 1.05%
RBA A 1.02%
GTLS A 1.02%
TPX A 0.98%
LOPE B 0.97%
WSM D 0.96%
CHRD D 0.94%
NEU D 0.94%
FND F 0.93%
PLNT A 0.93%
VAL F 0.92%
SKX F 0.91%
WSO A 0.89%
ALTR B 0.89%
CR B 0.88%
WLK F 0.83%
MTDR B 0.83%
RBC A 0.82%
CELH F 0.79%
HLNE B 0.79%
PSTG F 0.79%
OLED F 0.78%
CIVI C 0.77%
CROX F 0.76%
QLYS C 0.75%
LECO C 0.75%
TREX C 0.69%
LNW F 0.67%
PEN B 0.66%
VNT C 0.66%
ENSG D 0.62%
WMS F 0.62%
BCO F 0.6%
DBX C 0.59%
BYD B 0.58%
HALO D 0.55%
ARWR D 0.52%
CAR C 0.45%
FCN F 0.44%
ACHC F 0.35%
FIVE F 0.34%
COTY F 0.34%
RFG Underweight 36 Positions Relative to MID
Symbol Grade Weight
MSCI A -5.64%
ESI B -4.85%
MPWR F -4.05%
POOL D -4.0%
AVNT B -3.95%
BFAM F -3.94%
NET B -3.77%
RSG B -3.45%
CMG B -3.05%
CDW F -2.72%
CHD A -2.72%
HUBB B -2.71%
CDNS B -2.63%
TRGP A -2.44%
VST A -2.37%
ENPH F -2.26%
IDXX F -2.16%
NTRA B -2.07%
ONON B -2.07%
XYL D -1.93%
ABNB C -1.9%
EFX F -1.86%
ALNY D -1.78%
COR B -1.74%
ARGX B -1.69%
TPG A -1.6%
IQV F -1.59%
NU C -1.53%
PODD A -1.5%
VRT A -1.48%
CNM C -1.37%
DXCM C -1.33%
GEHC D -1.27%
TECH F -1.07%
AZEK B -0.98%
J D -0.87%
Compare ETFs