REGL vs. XMLV ETF Comparison

Comparison of ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) to PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (XMLV)

REGL

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

REGL Description

The investment seeks investment results before fees and expenses that track the performance of the S&P MidCap 400® Dividend Aristocrats Index. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities (i.e., securities of the index and comparable securities that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of the securities of the index). The index includes all companies meeting these requirements and includes a minimum of 40 stocks, each of which is equally weighted. No single sector is allowed to comprise more than 30% of the index&#39;s weight.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$86.17

Average Daily Volume

38,353

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XMLV

PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio

XMLV Description

The PowerShares S&P MidCap Low Volatility Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is compiled, maintained and calculated by Standard & Poor's, consisting of 80 out of 400 medium-capitalization range securities from the S&P MidCap 400 Index with the lowest realized volatility over the past 12 months. Volatility is a statistical measurement of the magnitude of up and down asset price fluctuations over time. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$64.32

Average Daily Volume

30,401

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	REGL	XMLV
30 Days	5.14%	4.62%
60 Days	6.02%	6.78%
90 Days	7.76%	8.41%
12 Months	28.23%	29.36%

26 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in REGL	Weight in XMLV	Overlap
AFG	A	2.17%	1.32%	1.32%
ATR	B	2.11%	1.8%	1.8%
BKH	A	2.09%	1.13%	1.13%
CHE	D	1.9%	1.17%	1.17%
DCI	B	2.09%	1.41%	1.41%
ELS	C	2.07%	1.2%	1.2%
FLO	D	1.94%	1.11%	1.11%
GGG	B	2.15%	1.32%	1.32%
MSA	F	2.12%	1.07%	1.07%
NFG	A	1.95%	1.16%	1.16%
NJR	A	2.06%	1.28%	1.28%
NNN	C	1.78%	1.09%	1.09%
NWE	B	2.01%	1.22%	1.22%
OGE	A	2.1%	1.34%	1.34%
OGS	A	2.04%	1.14%	1.14%
ORI	A	2.15%	1.44%	1.44%
POR	C	1.9%	1.1%	1.1%
RLI	A	2.22%	1.4%	1.4%
RPM	A	2.09%	1.32%	1.32%
SEIC	B	2.17%	1.8%	1.8%
SLGN	A	2.17%	1.16%	1.16%
SON	F	1.91%	1.22%	1.22%
SR	A	2.0%	1.21%	1.21%
THG	A	2.16%	1.45%	1.45%
UNM	A	2.25%	1.46%	1.46%
WTRG	B	1.96%	0.98%	0.98%

REGL Overweight 22 Positions Relative to XMLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
R	B	2.42%
CBSH	B	2.34%
UMBF	B	2.34%
EVR	B	2.3%
UBSI	B	2.29%
PB	B	2.26%
LECO	C	2.18%
CFR	B	2.18%
OZK	B	2.16%
PRGO	C	2.14%
LANC	C	2.13%
CASY	A	2.12%
SWX	B	2.06%
RRX	B	2.05%
TTC	C	2.02%
CSL	C	1.99%
WLK	D	1.91%
PII	F	1.91%
RNR	C	1.91%
UGI	C	1.9%
WSM	C	1.89%
RGLD	C	1.85%

REGL Underweight 53 Positions Relative to XMLV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DTM	A	-1.87%
CW	C	-1.78%
IBKR	A	-1.61%
SF	B	-1.6%
FHI	B	-1.55%
VOYA	B	-1.52%
INGR	C	-1.49%
IDA	A	-1.47%
HLI	A	-1.45%
PNM	B	-1.44%
EHC	B	-1.44%
RGA	A	-1.43%
JEF	A	-1.41%
G	B	-1.4%
JHG	B	-1.39%
CACI	D	-1.39%
FLS	B	-1.39%
AM	A	-1.35%
PRI	B	-1.33%
USFD	A	-1.31%
ADC	A	-1.29%
ACM	B	-1.28%
AMG	B	-1.28%
TXRH	B	-1.25%
GLPI	C	-1.23%
PPC	C	-1.22%
GNTX	C	-1.22%
OHI	C	-1.21%
GEF	A	-1.2%
AMH	C	-1.19%
POST	C	-1.19%
EPR	C	-1.18%
BRX	A	-1.17%
GATX	A	-1.16%
ALE	A	-1.15%
LSTR	D	-1.13%
SBRA	C	-1.13%
MTG	C	-1.13%
SNX	D	-1.11%
EGP	D	-1.09%
ESNT	F	-1.09%
CDP	C	-1.08%
AVT	C	-1.08%
FR	D	-1.07%
MUSA	B	-1.07%
NEU	D	-1.04%
STAG	D	-1.04%
NYT	D	-1.03%
DLB	B	-1.01%
KBR	F	-0.99%
MMS	F	-0.97%
MAN	F	-0.92%
CHRD	D	-0.87%