RDVY vs. PHO ETF Comparison

Comparison of First Trust NASDAQ Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) to Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO)
RDVY

First Trust NASDAQ Rising Dividend Achievers ETF

RDVY Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield (before the fees and expenses) of the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. The fund will normally invest at least 90% of its net assets (plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities that comprise the index. The index is composed of the securities of 50 companies with a history of raising their dividends and exhibit the characteristics to continue to do so in the future. The index is designed to provide access to a diversified portfolio of small, mid and large capitalization income producing securities. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$58.01

Average Daily Volume

686,209

Number of Holdings *

50

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PHO

Invesco Water Resources ETF

PHO Description The PowerShares Water Resources Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks and American depositary receipts (ADRs) of companies in the water industry that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index seeks to track the performance of US exchange-listed companies that create products designed to conserve and purify water for homes, businesses and industries. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly and reconstituted annually in April.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$69.01

Average Daily Volume

66,228

Number of Holdings *

36

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period RDVY PHO
30 Days 1.05% 0.58%
60 Days 1.93% 1.97%
90 Days 5.26% 5.11%
12 Months 24.14% 27.36%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in RDVY Weight in PHO Overlap
MLI B 2.38% 2.22% 2.22%
RDVY Overweight 49 Positions Relative to PHO
Symbol Grade Weight
DHI B 2.57%
AFL B 2.34%
LEN B 2.32%
RF B 2.25%
MTG B 2.23%
FITB B 2.22%
GRMN D 2.2%
ACN C 2.2%
JXN B 2.2%
MTB B 2.18%
CTSH C 2.17%
HIG A 2.17%
RDN B 2.15%
AXP B 2.15%
EWBC C 2.12%
CB B 2.12%
ODFL C 2.12%
OMC A 2.11%
MA B 2.1%
AAPL D 2.08%
CF B 2.06%
CSCO B 2.04%
JPM D 2.04%
SYF C 2.03%
SNA B 2.02%
IPG C 2.01%
V B 2.01%
DFS C 1.98%
ELV C 1.98%
CRC C 1.95%
XOM D 1.95%
SLM C 1.95%
COF C 1.95%
BAC D 1.91%
RS D 1.89%
EOG D 1.88%
EQH C 1.86%
MGY C 1.84%
MSFT C 1.84%
WSM C 1.74%
PCAR D 1.74%
KLAC D 1.74%
NUE F 1.73%
CHK D 1.7%
STLD D 1.67%
NKE D 1.57%
QCOM D 1.51%
AMAT D 1.51%
LRCX F 1.38%
RDVY Underweight 35 Positions Relative to PHO
Symbol Grade Weight
AWK A -8.82%
ECL B -8.46%
ROP C -8.11%
VLTO C -7.55%
PNR B -4.37%
ACM B -4.23%
WAT C -4.09%
TTC D -3.99%
AOS C -3.72%
IEX D -3.72%
XYL D -3.64%
WMS D -3.26%
WTRG D -3.22%
TTEK C -3.18%
CNM F -2.72%
VMI D -2.31%
ITRI C -2.14%
BMI B -1.76%
WTS C -1.39%
ZWS B -1.39%
MWA C -1.27%
CWT C -1.07%
AWR B -1.01%
FELE C -0.91%
SBS B -0.88%
SJW C -0.6%
LNN C -0.58%
MSEX C -0.42%
ERII D -0.36%
CWCO F -0.21%
GRC D -0.2%
YORW D -0.11%
ARTNA C -0.1%
NWPX C -0.09%
GWRS B -0.02%
Compare ETFs