RDIV vs. PHO ETF Comparison

Comparison of RevenueShares Ultra Dividend Fund (RDIV) to Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO)

RDIV

RevenueShares Ultra Dividend Fund

RDIV Description

The investment seeks to outperform the total return performance of the S&P 900Â® Index, the fund's benchmark index (the "benchmark index"). The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets in the securities of companies included in the benchmark index. The index is constructed by identifying the top 60 securities from the benchmark index with the highest average of the 1-year trailing dividend yields for the current quarter and each of the past three quarters, which are then re-weighted according to the revenue earned by the companies, subject to certain asset diversification requirements and a maximum 5% per company weighting. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$49.25

Average Daily Volume

39,257

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PHO

Invesco Water Resources ETF

PHO Description

The PowerShares Water Resources Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index. The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks and American depositary receipts (ADRs) of companies in the water industry that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index seeks to track the performance of US exchange-listed companies that create products designed to conserve and purify water for homes, businesses and industries. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly and reconstituted annually in April.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$70.00

Average Daily Volume

66,984

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RDIV	PHO
30 Days	-0.54%	0.30%
60 Days	5.43%	2.97%
90 Days	11.15%	9.35%
12 Months	42.53%	35.30%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RDIV	Weight in PHO	Overlap

RDIV Overweight 59 Positions Relative to PHO

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BMY	B	5.39%
BBY	B	5.34%
PM	C	5.14%
DUK	A	5.05%
PNC	C	4.92%
USB	C	4.82%
LYB	D	4.77%
KHC	D	4.68%
PRU	C	4.59%
F	D	3.76%
AEP	C	3.52%
JWN	D	2.74%
AMCR	B	2.57%
VTRS	D	2.52%
ETR	A	2.34%
FE	B	2.34%
FITB	C	2.32%
CAG	D	2.19%
CFG	D	2.03%
ES	C	2.03%
IPG	C	1.93%
HBAN	D	1.86%
WMB	A	1.85%
RF	C	1.61%
BEN	F	1.26%
TROW	D	1.07%
IVZ	A	1.03%
EVRG	C	1.02%
HAS	A	0.97%
PSA	C	0.94%
PNW	A	0.84%
FHN	D	0.79%
SMG	A	0.7%
VICI	C	0.68%
TNL	B	0.66%
VLY	C	0.66%
CRI	D	0.56%
EXR	C	0.54%
EQR	C	0.52%
OGE	A	0.49%
POR	C	0.48%
PK	D	0.47%
SR	C	0.44%
LAMR	C	0.41%
MAA	C	0.41%
JHG	C	0.4%
BKH	C	0.38%
KIM	C	0.35%
UDR	C	0.31%
ALE	A	0.29%
REG	C	0.26%
UBSI	D	0.26%
NWE	B	0.26%
BRX	C	0.24%
FRT	D	0.21%
CUBE	C	0.2%
DTM	A	0.17%
KRG	C	0.16%
ADC	B	0.1%

RDIV Underweight 36 Positions Relative to PHO

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ECL	B	-8.04%
ROP	C	-7.93%
XYL	C	-6.69%
VLTO	A	-6.42%
PNR	C	-4.38%
AOS	B	-4.25%
IEX	D	-4.11%
ACM	C	-4.1%
WAT	B	-4.09%
WMS	D	-3.98%
AWK	B	-3.98%
CNM	F	-3.75%
TTC	D	-3.72%
ITRI	C	-3.54%
TTEK	B	-3.11%
WTRG	D	-2.53%
MLI	C	-2.31%
VMI	B	-2.25%
WTS	C	-1.8%
BMI	A	-1.64%
ZWS	A	-1.52%
MWA	A	-1.22%
SBS	D	-1.13%
FELE	C	-0.84%
AWR	A	-0.83%
CWT	D	-0.75%
LNN	C	-0.66%
SJW	D	-0.55%
MSEX	C	-0.4%
ERII	B	-0.33%
GRC	B	-0.21%
ARTNA	D	-0.16%
CWCO	F	-0.13%
YORW	D	-0.11%
NWPX	C	-0.07%
GWRS	D	-0.01%