QVAL vs. FTDS ETF Comparison
Comparison of ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) to First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS)
QVAL
ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
QVAL Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF. Under normal circumstances, it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. equity securities that the Adviser believes, based on quantitative analysis, are undervalued at the time of purchase and have the potential for capital appreciation. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. It will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$45.11
Average Daily Volume
18,703
50
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
FTDS Description
The fund will normally invest at least 90% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in the common stocks and real estate investment companies (?REITs?) that comprise the index. The index is designed to provide exposure to well-capitalized companies with a history of increasing their dividends. The term ?well-capitalized? reflects companies that have strong balance sheets with durable cash flow and a record of profitability.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$51.60
Average Daily Volume
1,542
49
Performance
| Period | QVAL | FTDS |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 2.57% | 1.28% |
| 60 Days | 3.43% | 2.98% |
| 90 Days | 5.02% | 6.72% |
| 12 Months | 23.28% | 22.24% |
QVAL Overweight 45 Positions Relative to FTDS
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| T | B | 2.24% | |
| ULTA | D | 2.18% | |
| CRI | C | 2.18% | |
| DAL | C | 2.16% | |
| TPR | C | 2.14% | |
| SIG | C | 2.13% | |
| WSM | C | 2.11% | |
| POWL | C | 2.1% | |
| ASO | C | 2.1% | |
| TAP | C | 2.09% | |
| MOH | C | 2.08% | |
| CVS | D | 2.07% | |
| LEN | B | 2.07% | |
| CMCSA | D | 2.06% | |
| GPK | B | 2.06% | |
| KBH | B | 2.05% | |
| HRB | C | 2.04% | |
| ELV | C | 2.03% | |
| SKX | C | 2.03% | |
| OMC | A | 2.03% | |
| MO | C | 2.02% | |
| UFPI | C | 2.01% | |
| URBN | D | 2.0% | |
| MAT | C | 2.0% | |
| THC | B | 1.99% | |
| OC | C | 1.99% | |
| CAT | C | 1.98% | |
| FCX | D | 1.97% | |
| JBL | D | 1.97% | |
| CNC | C | 1.96% | |
| BKR | D | 1.96% | |
| WCC | C | 1.96% | |
| ALSN | B | 1.94% | |
| LBRT | D | 1.94% | |
| GTES | C | 1.94% | |
| FOXA | B | 1.94% | |
| CEIX | D | 1.89% | |
| TEX | D | 1.88% | |
| MPC | D | 1.88% | |
| ARCH | F | 1.88% | |
| SLB | F | 1.88% | |
| HAL | F | 1.87% | |
| CROX | C | 1.82% | |
| WFRD | F | 1.79% | |
| SM | D | 1.77% |
QVAL Underweight 44 Positions Relative to FTDS
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMT | C | -2.39% | |
| TRV | B | -2.33% | |
| AFL | B | -2.32% | |
| G | C | -2.32% | |
| HIG | A | -2.29% | |
| CINF | B | -2.25% | |
| EBAY | B | -2.23% | |
| RLI | B | -2.17% | |
| ORI | A | -2.17% | |
| NKE | D | -2.13% | |
| SYY | D | -2.12% | |
| CF | B | -2.12% | |
| GRMN | D | -2.11% | |
| RPM | B | -2.1% | |
| DGX | B | -2.08% | |
| GD | B | -2.08% | |
| UNP | B | -2.07% | |
| EMN | B | -2.01% | |
| UNM | B | -2.01% | |
| CMI | C | -2.01% | |
| SF | A | -2.0% | |
| HII | C | -1.97% | |
| EWBC | C | -1.97% | |
| TGT | C | -1.96% | |
| EG | B | -1.96% | |
| BPOP | C | -1.95% | |
| GPC | D | -1.95% | |
| PPG | C | -1.95% | |
| DKS | D | -1.94% | |
| ROK | D | -1.93% | |
| CBSH | C | -1.92% | |
| TEL | D | -1.9% | |
| DINO | D | -1.9% | |
| EQH | C | -1.86% | |
| HON | D | -1.86% | |
| CFR | C | -1.86% | |
| ZION | D | -1.85% | |
| ADM | D | -1.83% | |
| EOG | D | -1.83% | |
| PSX | D | -1.82% | |
| COP | D | -1.8% | |
| BG | D | -1.71% | |
| CTRA | F | -1.68% | |
| LW | D | -1.61% |
QVAL: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
FTDS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
