QTUM vs. DEEP ETF Comparison

Comparison of Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) to Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP)

QTUM

Defiance Quantum ETF

QTUM Description

The investment seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index (the "index"). Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund's total assets (exclusive of any collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index or in depositary receipts representing such component securities. The index consists of a modified equal-weighted portfolio of the stock of companies whose products or services are predominantly tied to the development of quantum computing and machine learning technology. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$62.12

Average Daily Volume

31,845

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

DEEP

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF

DEEP Description

The investment seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Acquirers Deep Value Index (the “index”). The index was established in 2020 by Acquirers Funds LLC and tracks the performance of a portfolio of 20 of the most undervalued, fundamentally strong stocks drawn from the largest 500 stocks listed in the United States meeting certain liquidity thresholds. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund’s total assets (exclusive of any collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.63

Average Daily Volume

2,358

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	QTUM	DEEP
30 Days	-0.11%	-2.03%
60 Days	-0.23%	-4.55%
90 Days	9.67%	-3.50%
12 Months	35.08%	8.25%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in QTUM	Weight in DEEP	Overlap
	NVEC	F	1.25%	1.02%	1.02%

QTUM Overweight 49 Positions Relative to DEEP

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MSTR	B	2.48%
RGTI	B	2.3%
COHR	B	1.93%
NOK	B	1.83%
QBTS	C	1.81%
BABA	B	1.8%
IBM	C	1.78%
ACN	C	1.78%
BAH	A	1.73%
LMT	D	1.7%
WIT	B	1.7%
NOC	D	1.69%
RTX	C	1.66%
MRVL	A	1.6%
TSM	B	1.59%
NVDA	B	1.58%
JNPR	A	1.55%
RDNT	D	1.53%
TXN	A	1.46%
AMD	F	1.41%
CRUS	F	1.4%
BIDU	F	1.39%
HON	B	1.39%
ABBV	A	1.38%
ADI	C	1.36%
MSFT	D	1.36%
ON	D	1.34%
TDC	B	1.34%
HPE	A	1.33%
GOOGL	A	1.32%
ONTO	F	1.27%
NXPI	C	1.24%
LSCC	C	1.22%
SNPS	B	1.18%
KLAC	F	1.15%
MCHP	F	1.15%
CDNS	C	1.14%
QCOM	D	1.13%
AMAT	F	1.1%
SYNA	F	1.08%
FORM	F	1.08%
MU	C	1.07%
MKSI	F	1.06%
INTC	C	1.05%
TER	F	1.05%
LRCX	F	1.02%
ESTC	D	0.98%
ASML	F	0.93%
STM	F	0.89%

QTUM Underweight 95 Positions Relative to DEEP

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TTEC	D	-1.34%
BBW	A	-1.16%
VSTO	A	-1.16%
SMLR	C	-1.15%
PGC	A	-1.13%
FF	B	-1.13%
HELE	C	-1.12%
DMLP	A	-1.12%
ARCH	B	-1.12%
RCMT	A	-1.11%
VBTX	B	-1.1%
GPRK	F	-1.09%
ODP	C	-1.09%
NX	C	-1.08%
RYI	C	-1.08%
BMRC	A	-1.07%
NRP	B	-1.06%
ITRN	C	-1.06%
PFBC	B	-1.06%
HSII	A	-1.05%
INMD	C	-1.05%
WLKP	C	-1.05%
DAC	D	-1.05%
AMPY	F	-1.05%
UAN	D	-1.05%
INVA	C	-1.05%
PLPC	A	-1.05%
WTI	F	-1.04%
BSIG	A	-1.03%
GIC	F	-1.03%
BHLB	B	-1.03%
CRCT	B	-1.03%
IGIC	A	-1.03%
PLAB	F	-1.03%
DXLG	F	-1.02%
RMR	D	-1.02%
WINA	A	-1.02%
HLF	D	-1.02%
MBUU	A	-1.01%
BKE	C	-1.01%
JBSS	F	-1.01%
RGR	F	-1.01%
SWBI	D	-1.01%
GIII	C	-1.01%
METC	F	-1.0%
DHT	F	-1.0%
UTMD	F	-1.0%
HTBK	D	-0.99%
RMAX	C	-0.99%
EPM	F	-0.99%
HDSN	F	-0.99%
OFLX	C	-0.99%
PRDO	B	-0.99%
MOV	F	-0.98%
MED	D	-0.98%
BXC	A	-0.97%
CLFD	D	-0.97%
DHIL	D	-0.97%
HCKT	D	-0.97%
SD	F	-0.96%
USNA	D	-0.96%
DFIN	F	-0.96%
ETD	F	-0.96%
SBH	B	-0.96%
NATR	D	-0.96%
WRLD	D	-0.95%
LESL	F	-0.95%
XPEL	F	-0.95%
UPBD	D	-0.94%
MCFT	D	-0.93%
AMCX	F	-0.93%
WGO	D	-0.92%
PARR	F	-0.92%
JOUT	F	-0.92%
LEGH	C	-0.92%
NUS	F	-0.92%
LPRO	C	-0.92%
HVT	F	-0.91%
IIIN	F	-0.91%
IRWD	F	-0.91%
ASC	F	-0.9%
KFRC	D	-0.9%
WNC	F	-0.9%
AMN	F	-0.9%
LPG	F	-0.9%
SMP	B	-0.89%
MYE	F	-0.89%
IMKTA	D	-0.89%
NRC	F	-0.88%
HZO	F	-0.84%
RGP	F	-0.84%
HOV	D	-0.84%
CCRN	F	-0.83%
TH	F	-0.8%
SIGA	D	-0.79%