QQQG vs. AMID ETF Comparison

Comparison of Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) to Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID)

QQQG

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF

QQQG Description

The initial Index universe is typically derived from the component companies of the Nasdaq-100 Index®. The initial universe of companies is typically screened based on their average projected free cash flows and earnings (if available) over each of the next two fiscal years. Under normal circumstances, the fund will seek to invest at least 80% of the fund"s total assets in growth securities. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$21.63

Average Daily Volume

2,146

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

AMID Description

AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$36.72

Average Daily Volume

7,812

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	QQQG	AMID
30 Days	2.32%	4.32%
60 Days	4.91%	3.96%
90 Days	4.30%	4.88%
12 Months		34.06%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in QQQG	Weight in AMID	Overlap
CPRT	B	2.05%	3.56%	2.05%
CTAS	B	3.69%	3.66%	3.66%
FTNT	C	1.48%	3.34%	1.48%

QQQG Overweight 47 Positions Relative to AMID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NVDA	B	6.0%
TTD	B	5.16%
AVGO	D	4.6%
KLAC	F	3.69%
FANG	C	3.41%
META	D	3.25%
AMAT	F	3.21%
GOOGL	C	3.03%
QCOM	F	2.91%
NXPI	D	2.86%
AAPL	C	2.84%
NFLX	A	2.79%
ADI	D	2.73%
DASH	B	2.39%
BKNG	A	2.37%
EA	A	2.08%
VRSK	A	1.93%
ADP	A	1.93%
LRCX	F	1.92%
MRVL	B	1.77%
PAYX	B	1.77%
REGN	F	1.62%
MSFT	D	1.6%
SNPS	B	1.59%
INTU	B	1.54%
ADSK	A	1.47%
AMGN	F	1.38%
ROP	B	1.36%
PANW	B	1.35%
CSCO	B	1.34%
GILD	C	1.29%
MCHP	F	1.25%
CSX	C	1.2%
MELI	C	1.17%
ANSS	B	1.17%
DDOG	A	1.15%
ABNB	C	1.14%
CDNS	B	1.13%
CRWD	B	1.04%
MNST	C	0.99%
TEAM	A	0.95%
IDXX	F	0.86%
ADBE	C	0.84%
WDAY	B	0.8%
ZS	B	0.76%
LULU	C	0.61%
DXCM	C	0.47%

QQQG Underweight 34 Positions Relative to AMID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FICO	B	-3.79%
BLDR	D	-3.43%
HLI	A	-3.2%
CBZ	B	-2.93%
LPLA	A	-2.87%
CDW	F	-2.86%
VCTR	B	-2.86%
DHI	F	-2.85%
IT	C	-2.83%
MEDP	D	-2.69%
MUSA	B	-2.63%
HCA	F	-2.49%
BAH	F	-2.45%
BLD	D	-2.43%
OMF	A	-2.4%
URI	C	-2.35%
AFG	A	-2.28%
GDDY	A	-2.24%
A	D	-2.12%
ADUS	D	-2.09%
CG	B	-2.05%
SCI	B	-2.05%
TPX	B	-1.99%
AME	A	-1.98%
ICFI	F	-1.93%
LNG	A	-1.69%
CHDN	B	-1.57%
ABG	C	-1.55%
ENTG	D	-1.52%
MOH	F	-1.44%
PATK	C	-1.35%
TTEK	F	-1.33%
AX	B	-1.11%
EXPO	D	-0.99%