QMOM vs. XHS ETF Comparison

Comparison of MomentumShares U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS)
QMOM

MomentumShares U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF

QMOM Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. The fund will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund may invest in securities of companies in any industry and of any market capitalization. Although the fund generally expects to invest in companies with larger market capitalizations, the fund may invest in small- and mid-capitalization companies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$70.95

Average Daily Volume

25,323

Number of Holdings *

48

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$95.54

Average Daily Volume

3,976

Number of Holdings *

58

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period QMOM XHS
30 Days 10.14% 2.23%
60 Days 10.46% -1.36%
90 Days 15.18% -3.31%
12 Months 53.68% 12.13%
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in QMOM Weight in XHS Overlap
DVA B 2.08% 1.98% 1.98%
HCA F 1.81% 1.83% 1.81%
THC D 1.93% 2.1% 1.93%
UHS D 1.83% 1.81% 1.81%
QMOM Overweight 44 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
SPOT B 2.3%
NTRA B 2.27%
ADMA B 2.27%
POWL C 2.25%
SFM A 2.24%
EME C 2.18%
FICO B 2.18%
SYF B 2.17%
GDDY A 2.17%
GNRC B 2.15%
JEF A 2.14%
EVR B 2.12%
HWM A 2.12%
WING D 2.11%
VST B 2.1%
RCL A 2.1%
EAT A 2.08%
TT A 2.06%
FITB A 2.03%
CRS A 2.02%
KKR A 2.02%
AXP A 2.0%
STEP B 2.0%
ANF C 2.0%
BLDR D 1.98%
ISRG A 1.98%
MMM D 1.96%
PWR A 1.96%
NRG B 1.95%
TOL B 1.95%
GWRE A 1.94%
GE D 1.93%
TXRH C 1.93%
BLD D 1.92%
NVR D 1.91%
CBRE B 1.88%
WSM B 1.87%
LEN D 1.87%
META D 1.84%
TRU D 1.84%
PSN D 1.73%
SN D 1.72%
CEG D 1.62%
ZETA D 1.12%
QMOM Underweight 54 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
HIMS B -2.63%
HQY B -2.56%
RDNT B -2.5%
MCK B -2.46%
GH B -2.36%
PINC B -2.35%
EHC B -2.27%
LH C -2.26%
CAH B -2.24%
SEM B -2.21%
DGX A -2.13%
RCM F -2.12%
COR B -2.12%
PRVA B -2.1%
UNH C -2.09%
CHE D -2.05%
ENSG D -2.0%
CVS D -1.99%
HSIC B -1.98%
ADUS D -1.96%
AMED F -1.95%
PDCO D -1.87%
CI F -1.86%
HUM C -1.84%
MOH F -1.79%
USPH B -1.7%
SGRY F -1.67%
CRVL A -1.65%
CNC D -1.63%
ELV F -1.55%
BKD D -1.48%
OMI F -1.48%
NEO C -1.45%
OPCH D -1.45%
MD B -1.41%
AHCO F -1.25%
CLOV D -1.25%
CSTL D -1.24%
LFST C -1.24%
PGNY F -1.21%
ALHC C -1.14%
AMN F -1.06%
ACHC F -1.05%
NHC C -1.02%
ASTH D -1.01%
AGL F -1.01%
PNTG D -0.71%
ACCD D -0.64%
OPK C -0.64%
CYH F -0.63%
CCRN F -0.59%
MODV C -0.52%
FLGT F -0.42%
NRC F -0.31%
Compare ETFs