PWER vs. SETM ETF Comparison
Comparison of Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER) to Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM)
PWER
Macquarie Energy Transition ETF
PWER Description
The ETF seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in a diversified portfolio of securities in the energy, materials, industrial, renewable energy, and utilities sectors that meet the fund"s investment criteria.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$29.34
Average Daily Volume
616
Number of Holdings
*
23
* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
SETM
Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF
SETM Description
The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in securities of the index. The index is designed to track the performance of companies that derive at least 50% of their revenue and/or assets from (i) mining, exploration, development, production, recycling, refining, or smelting of energy transition materials; (ii) investments in energy transition materials that represent all or a significant portion of their assets. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$17.82
Average Daily Volume
16,659
Number of Holdings
*
16
* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
| Period | PWER | SETM |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -0.34% | -4.81% |
| 60 Days | 3.53% | 7.80% |
| 90 Days | 3.40% | 7.22% |
| 12 Months | 8.58% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in PWER | Weight in SETM | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | B | 4.11% | 4.41% | 4.11% |
PWER Overweight 22 Positions Relative to SETM
PWER: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
SETM: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
