PKB vs. EATZ ETF Comparison
Comparison of PowerShares Dynamic Build & Construction (PKB) to AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ)
PKB
PowerShares Dynamic Build & Construction
PKB Description
The PowerShares Dynamic Building & Construction Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Building & Construction IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 30 US building and construction companies. These are companies that are primarily engaged in providing construction and related engineering services for building and remodeling residential properties, commercial or industrial buildings, or working on large-scale infrastructure projects, such as highways, tunnels, bridges, dams, power lines, and airports. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$79.14
Average Daily Volume
35,120
28
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.79
Average Daily Volume
2,246
20
Performance
Period | PKB | EATZ |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 6.34% | 5.46% |
60 Days | 10.86% | 13.16% |
90 Days | 18.60% | 11.03% |
12 Months | 58.80% | 42.30% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in PKB | Weight in EATZ | Overlap |
---|
PKB Overweight 28 Positions Relative to EATZ
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
PHM | A | 5.07% | |
TT | A | 5.07% | |
NVR | A | 4.99% | |
CSL | A | 4.97% | |
MLM | D | 4.84% | |
LEN | B | 4.78% | |
DHI | B | 4.73% | |
AGX | B | 3.32% | |
STRL | C | 3.1% | |
USLM | C | 3.07% | |
KNF | C | 2.94% | |
TPC | B | 2.84% | |
EXP | C | 2.84% | |
MTZ | C | 2.83% | |
LPX | A | 2.8% | |
MDU | C | 2.78% | |
TOL | A | 2.75% | |
APOG | B | 2.68% | |
GRBK | B | 2.68% | |
PRIM | C | 2.67% | |
MHO | A | 2.66% | |
SKY | A | 2.64% | |
MHK | B | 2.62% | |
SWX | C | 2.61% | |
MTH | B | 2.6% | |
KBH | C | 2.6% | |
TILE | B | 2.54% | |
TPH | B | 2.54% |
PKB Underweight 20 Positions Relative to EATZ
PKB: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords