PGJ vs. PSL ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to PowerShares Dynamic Consumer Staples (PSL)
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$22.93

Average Daily Volume

47,799

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PSL

PowerShares Dynamic Consumer Staples

PSL Description The PowerShares Dynamic Consumer Staples Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Consumer Staples Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of common stocks of 60 US consumer staples companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the businesses of providing consumer goods and services that have non-cyclical characteristics, including tobacco, textiles, food and beverage, and non-discretionary retail. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$96.97

Average Daily Volume

1,552

Number of Holdings *

35

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period PGJ PSL
30 Days -6.73% -0.65%
60 Days -11.39% -0.10%
90 Days -3.46% 2.39%
12 Months -6.73% 13.88%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in PGJ Weight in PSL Overlap
PGJ Overweight 54 Positions Relative to PSL
Symbol Grade Weight
BABA D 8.2%
TCOM C 8.19%
JD D 6.95%
BIDU F 6.91%
YUMC F 6.6%
NTES D 4.58%
TME B 4.39%
BEKE C 3.96%
ZTO F 3.87%
NIO F 3.84%
BZ D 3.61%
VIPS F 3.41%
YMM D 3.22%
HTHT F 3.15%
TAL D 2.69%
LI F 2.59%
QFIN D 1.77%
IQ D 1.24%
XPEV F 1.2%
BILI C 1.15%
ATHM D 1.13%
HOLI B 0.94%
RLX F 0.79%
ATAT B 0.75%
MNSO F 0.74%
DQ F 0.71%
MOMO B 0.65%
CSIQ F 0.63%
GDS B 0.63%
FINV C 0.57%
JKS D 0.57%
ZLAB F 0.54%
GOTU D 0.53%
WB D 0.48%
TIGR B 0.37%
EH D 0.36%
SOHU A 0.3%
HUYA C 0.27%
QD F 0.23%
VNET C 0.2%
RERE C 0.19%
DOYU B 0.19%
DDL C 0.18%
NOAH D 0.17%
LX F 0.14%
TUYA F 0.13%
KC F 0.12%
API D 0.11%
WDH D 0.1%
DADA F 0.1%
DAO C 0.09%
BZUN D 0.07%
NIU F 0.06%
IMAB F 0.06%
PGJ Underweight 35 Positions Relative to PSL
Symbol Grade Weight
ELF C -5.02%
SFM B -4.85%
COST A -4.74%
CHD C -4.2%
CASY B -4.11%
SCI C -3.85%
COKE B -3.82%
PG C -3.63%
HRB B -3.31%
FRPT A -3.21%
BRBR B -3.19%
USFD C -3.1%
KR C -3.0%
PEP D -2.97%
LRN D -2.65%
CELH F -2.62%
MNST D -2.52%
KHC D -2.48%
MDLZ D -2.46%
CALM B -2.36%
PRDO C -2.32%
TAP F -2.31%
LOPE C -2.31%
LAUR C -2.2%
BFAM C -2.2%
POST C -2.17%
STRA C -2.15%
INGR D -2.15%
ANDE D -2.12%
UTI B -2.12%
PFGC D -2.07%
COTY F -2.0%
WDFC D -1.95%
IPAR F -1.92%
UTZ D -1.66%
Compare ETFs